AIBT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AIBT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-09 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-19
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +8 | −18 | ~4 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-09
We did not have revenue and cost of revenue from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to $2,183 in revenue and cost of revenue from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, consisted solely of general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of consulting fees, stock-based compensation, board compensation, and legal and professional services. For the three…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 our interest expense decreased by $3,291, or 5%, from $61,933 to $58,642. The decrease was primarily the result in differences in the convertible notes payable we had outstanding during the three months ended…
Liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. As of March 31, 2026, we had $288,858 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $255,940 at December 31, 2025, an increase of $32,918 resulting primarily from financing activities o…
As of March 31, 2026, we had a working capital deficiency of $4,720,284 down from a working capital deficiency of $4,564,798 as of December 31, 2025. At March 31, 2026 our current assets were $331,050 and consisted almost entirely of cash. At March 31, 2026 our current liabilities were $5,051,334 an…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-19
We did not have any revenue or cost of revenue from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 consisted solely of general and administrative expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, general and administrative expenses increased by $95,108, or 25%, compared to the same period in 2024, from $385,257 to $4…
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2025 decreased by $63,733 or 85%, compared to the same period in 2024, decreasing from $74,887 to $11,154 The decrease was primarily driven by the absence of interest expense related to convertible notes following the conversion of accrued in…
Loss on extinguishment of liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2025 increased by $38,403 or 100%, compared to the same period in 2024, increasing from $0 to $38,403. The increase was primarily driven by the loss recognized on the conversion of accrued interest during the current peri…
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice