ALAB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ALAB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +27 | −20 | ~7 | 19 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +4 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Our revenue was $700.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $351.4 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 99% year over year.
Gross margin decreased by 250 basis points (“bps”) to 73.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 75.8% for the same period in 2025.
Gross margin decreased by 80 bps to 74.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 75.4% for the same period in 2025.
Operating income was $89.2 million and $151.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $39.8 million and $51.1 million for the same periods in 2025, respectively, representing an increase of 124% and 196% year over year, respectively.
Net income was $153.1 million and $233.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 respectively, compared to $51.2 million and $83.0 million for the same periods in 2025, respectively, representing an increase of 199% and 181% year over year, respectively.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Gross margin increased by 136 basis points (“bps”) to 76.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 74.9% for the same period in 2025.
Operating income was $61.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $11.3 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 448% year over year.
Net income was $80.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $31.8 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 152% year over year.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Total revenue increased $148.9 million, or 93%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to an increase in overall unit shipments driven by higher demand for our Scorpio, Aries, and Taurus products, as well as higher overall average selling prices…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Aggregate Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Purchased or Sold Pursuant to a Trading Arrangement
(1) Except as indicated by footnote, each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act, as amended (the “Rule”).
(2) Except as indicated by footnote, each trading arrangement permitted or permits transactions through and including the earlier to occur of (a) the completion of sales or (b) the date listed in the table. Each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” only permits transacti…
(3) The shares covered by this trading arrangement include certain shares that are held by trusts and may be deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by Manuel Alba.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice