ALAB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ALAB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −34 | ~14 | 7 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −22 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −4 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Our revenue was $308.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $159.4 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 93% year over year.
Gross margin increased by 136 basis points (“bps”) to 76.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 74.9% for the same period in 2025.
Operating income was $61.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $11.3 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 448% year over year.
Net income was $80.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $31.8 million for the same period in 2025, representing an increase of 152% year over year.
Total cost of revenue increased $33.2 million, or 83%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to higher overall unit shipments and a favorable shift in product mix.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
Our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 increased by 104% and 128%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2024. The increase for both periods was primarily due to an increase in overall unit shipments driven by higher demand for our Aries, Scorpio, and Taurus produ…
Gross margin decreased by 150 basis points (“bps”) and 200 bps to 76.2% and 75.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, compared to 77.7% and 77.7%, respectively, for the same periods in 2024. The decrease for both periods was primarily driven by product mix as we shi…
Operating expenses increased by $23.6 million, or 24%, for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily driven by a $23.7 million increase in headcount related expenses resulting from a 79% increase in headcount, a $2.2 million increase i…
Operating expenses increased by $19.9 million, or 6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily driven by a $59.7 million increase in headcount related expenses resulting from a 77% increase in headcount, a $13.1 million increase in…
Total cost of revenue increased $29.6 million, or 117%, and $84.2 million, or 148%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher overall unit shipments and a shift in product mix, resulting from a…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to pr…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial report…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of September 30, 2025, which was the end of the period…
Notwithstanding these identified material weaknesses, management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, believes that the interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all mat…
Previously Reported Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As …
We did not adequately design and maintain an effective risk assessment process at a sufficient precision level to identify risks of material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements. Specifically, the implementation of controls
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
Aggregate Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Purchased or Sold Pursuant to a Trading Arrangement
(1) Except as indicated by footnote, each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act, as amended (the “Rule”).
(2) Except as indicated by footnote, each trading arrangement permitted or permits transactions through and including the earlier to occur of (a) the completion of sales or (b) the date listed in the table. Each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” only permits transacti…
(3) Trading arrangement was originally adopted on August 28, 2024.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice