DTI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DTI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-08 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +14 | −19 | ~16 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~2 | 5 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −4 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −4 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The following table summarized average oil and natural gas prices in North America over the indicated periods as well as International and Domestic industry activity levels as reflected by the average number of active onshore drilling rigs during the same periods.
(1) U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) Cushing, OK WTI (“West Texas Intermediate”) monthly average spot price per barrel of crude oil.
(2) EIA Henry Hub Natural Gas monthly average spot price per million British Thermal Unit (“MMBtu”).
(3) Baker Hughes, includes land and offshore activity and does not include miscellaneous rigs
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the oil and gas market continued to reflect a dynamic interplay of geopolitical tensions, shifting demand patterns, and broader macroeconomic factors. U.S. oil production remained near record levels, supported by sustained activity in the Permian Basin a…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
In the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the oil and gas market witnessed a dynamic interplay of geopolitical tensions, shifting demand dynamics, and evolving geopolitical and economic factors. U.S. oil production reached record highs, averaging 13.5 million
barrels per day, driven by the Permian Basin and offshore developments. However, this surge in supply coincided with an increasing surplus in global oil supply over demand, leading to downward pressure on prices. Crude oil prices experienced declines, specially WTI, whose quarterly average decreased…
In the nine months ended September 30, 2025, U.S. natural gas prices experienced a notable rebound following the record lows of 2024. The Henry Hub spot price averaged approximately $3.03 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) during the third quarter, or a 43% increase compared to the third quar…
Notwithstanding the significant commodity price volatility over the past several years, we have seen decreases in both the Western and Eastern Hemisphere. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the weekly average Western Hemisphere rig count, as reported by Baker Hughes was 851 a…
We are experiencing the impacts of global inflation, both in increased personnel costs and the prices of goods and services required to operate our rigs and execute capital projects. While we are currently unable to estimate the ultimate impact of rising prices, we do expect that our costs will cont…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
trade practices. Foreign governments have imposed, and may impose in the future, retaliatory tariffs on goods that their countries import from the U.S. Such changes can make it difficult or costly for us to do business in, or import our products from, those countries.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (…
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorde…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with…
As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were deemed ineffective by management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This conclusion stems from the continued presence of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, …
The material weakness relates to ineffective monitoring activities to assess the operation of internal control over financial reporting. While progress has been made, such as implementing a control testing plan based on applicable reporting frameworks, further improvements are needed. The elements o…
On August 1, 2024, we acquired Superior Drilling Products. As the acquisition date has exceeded one year, we are now required to assess internal controls over financial reporting. Additionally, on January 2, 2025, we completed the acquisition of Titan Tools. We are permitted to omit an assessment of…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none our officers and directors entered into new 10b5-1 trading plans. Additionally, none of the officers and directors modified or terminated existing 10b5-1 trading plans.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, Michael Domino, President, Directional Tool Rentals Division adopted a pre-arranged stock trading plan in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The trading plans is intended to satisfy the affirmative defen…
The plans was adopted during an open trading window in accordance with the Company’s insider trading policy and are further described below:
Michael Domino, President - Directional Tool Rentals Division
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, Michael Domino, President - Directional Tool Rentals Division, sold 4,166 shares of common stock pursuant to a pre-arranged trading plan adopted under Rule 10b5-1.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice