EMP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EMP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-01 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-10-31
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +262 | −496 | ~62 | 64 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +17 | −17 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): MD&A, Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
See the “Winter Storm Fern” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of Winter Storm Fern. Entergy Arkansas’s current estimate for the cost of mobilizing crews and restoring power is approximately $50 million, including approxima…
Net income decreased $3.8 million primarily due to higher interest expense and lower volume/weather, partially offset by higher retail electric price.
Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the three months ended March 31, 2026 to the three months ended March 31, 2025:
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income21.8
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan rates effective January 2026. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for discussion of the 2025 formula rate plan filing.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-31
Net income increased $6 million primarily due to higher volume/weather and higher retail electric price, partially offset by an $18.3 million reduction in income tax expense in third quarter 2024 as a result of the resolution of an Arkansas state income tax audit, higher taxes other than income taxe…
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
Net income increased $128.6 million primarily due to a $131.8 million ($99.1 million net-of-tax) charge to reflect the write-off of a previously recorded regulatory asset as a result of an adverse decision in the opportunity sales proceeding in March 2024, higher volume/weather, and higher retail el…
Following is an analysis of the change in operating revenues comparing the third quarter 2025 to the third quarter 2024:
Fuel, rider, and other revenues that do not significantly affect net income40.6
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the following directors or officers of Entergy or the Registrant Subsidiaries adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K, relating t…
Name and TitleActionDate of ActionType of Trading Arrangement
(a)Aggregate Number of Shares to be Purchased or SoldExpiration Date
Kimberly S. Cook-Nelson, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Entergy, Director of Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
Phillip R. May, Jr., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Louisiana
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-31
The Staff of the Division of Enforcement of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission conducted an investigation regarding Entergy’s processes and controls relating to its accounting for materials and supplies inventory. In December 2024, Entergy reached a settlement with the SEC to resolve the pr…
No director or officer of Entergy or any of the Registrant Subsidiaries adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
The following are updates to the “Regulation of the Nuclear Power Industry” section of Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.
In March 2025 filings with the NRC were made that reported the decommissioning funding for all of Entergy’s subsidiaries’ nuclear plants. Those reports showed that decommissioning funding for each of the nuclear plants met the NRC’s financial assurance requirements.
The NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process is a program to collect information about plant performance, assess the information for its safety significance, and provide for appropriate licensee and NRC response. The NRC evaluates plant performance by analyzing two distinct inputs: inspection findings result…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice