INTJvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of INTJ against SIC 8742 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTJThis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FOFO | $19M#1 | — | 2.2x#1 | 8.0x#1 | 14.7%#4 | -1206.2%#7 | -418.9%#4 | -112.1%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| GFLT | — | — | — | — | 50.8%#2 | -284.4%#6 | -59653.0%#7 | -83.1%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| GLVT | — | — | — | — | -7.2%#5 | 78.7%#3 | -179.0%#2 | — | — | — | — | — |
| GTCH | — | — | — | — | -50.0%#6 | -103.5%#4 | -350.3%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| HSTA | — | — | — | — | -99.4%#7 | -246.9%#5 | -3811.5%#6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| LBRA | — | — | — | — | 207.3%#1 | 165.8%#1 | 8.2%#1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| LEEN | — | — | — | — | 34.9%#3 | 112.6%#2 | -986.7%#5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 8742). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-08-04.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice