NMFC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NMFC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +63 | −72 | ~45 | 87 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
•New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. ("NMF Holdings"), whose assets are used to secure NMF Holdings’ credit facility;
Similar to us, the investment objective of each of SBIC I, SBIC II and SBIC III, is to generate current income and capital appreciation under the investment criteria we use. However, investments made by SBIC I, SBIC II and SBIC III must be in SBA eligible small businesses.
Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of industries. As of March 31, 2026, our top five industry concentrations were business services, healthcare, software, investment funds (which includes our investments in our joint ventures) and consumer services.
As of March 31, 2026, our net asset value was approximately $1,043.5 million and our portfolio had a fair value, as determined in good faith by the board of directors, of approximately $2,313.4 million in 114 portfolio companies, with a weighted average yield to maturity at cost for income producing…
agreements, are purchased at cost on the quarter end date and held until their respective maturities with no prepayments or losses and exited at par at maturity. YTM at Cost and YTM at Cost for Investments calculations exclude the impact of existing leverage. YTM at Cost and YTM at Cost for Investme…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
•New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. ("NMF Holdings") and New Mountain Finance DB, L.L.C. ("NMFDB"), whose assets are used to secure NMF Holdings’ credit facility and were used to secure NMFDB’s credit facility, until its termination on September 30, 2024, respectively;
Similar to us, the investment objective of each of SBIC I, SBIC II and SBIC III, is to generate current income and capital appreciation under the investment criteria we use. However, SBIC I, SBIC II and SBIC III investments must be in SBA eligible small businesses. Our portfolio may be concentrated …
As of September 30, 2025, our net asset value was approximately $1,256.6 million and our portfolio had a fair value, as determined in good faith by the board of directors, of approximately $2,943.6 million in 126 portfolio companies, with a weighted average yield to maturity at cost for income produ…
par at maturity. The YTM at Cost for Investments calculation assumes that all investments, including secured collateralized agreements, are purchased at cost on the quarter end date and held until their respective maturities with no prepayments or losses and exited at par at maturity. YTM at Cost an…
On October 15, 2025, we repaid the outstanding principal of $258.7 million and accrued but unpaid interest in cash on the 2022 Convertible Notes, which matured on October 15, 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice