OFLX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OFLX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-01 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-10-31
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +3 | −15 | ~18 | 13 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based u…
Retained earnings were $72,623,000 and $73,979,000 as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, decreasing $1,356,000 or 1.8%. The decrease was primarily due to a dividend declared during 2026, as discussed in detail in Note 9, Shareholders’ Equity, to the Condensed Consolidated Financi…
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The ASU expands public entities tax disclosures including improving disclosures surrounding the company’s rate reconciliation, cash taxes paid, and disaggregation of income tax expens…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-31
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. This discussion and other parts of this report contain forw…
Retained earnings were $73,995,000 and $72,880,000 as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, increasing $1,115,000 or 1.5%. The increase was primarily due to net income during the year, as provided on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, partially offset by …
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2024
The Company reported comparative results from operations for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 as follows:
Net Sales. The Company’s sales for the first nine months of 2025 of $73,089,000 decreased $1,627,000 or 2.2% compared to the first nine months of 2024, which generated sales of $74,716,000. The decrease in sales is mainly due to lower sales unit volumes as the residential housing market continues to…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice