PRLB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRLB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-01
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −9 | ~28 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
Three Months Ended June 30,ChangeSix Months Ended June 30,Change
Costs related to exit and disposal. Costs related to disposal and exit activities are primarily driven by our decision to close certain manufacturing facilities in Germany. Our costs related to exit and disposal increased $0.8 million primarily related to the write-down of the abandoned facility rig…
Revenue by reportable segment and the related changes for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)$% of Total Revenue$% of Total Revenue$%
Our revenue increased $27.4 million, or 10.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. By reportable segment, revenue in the United States increased $23.9 million, or 11.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. Revenue in Eur…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
Benefits related to exit and disposal activities— —(39)—39 (100.0)
Costs related to exit and disposal. We had no costs related to exit and disposal activities during the three months ended March 31, 2026. Our decision to exit and close certain operations in Germany resulted in less than a $0.1 million in personnel and related cost benefits during the three months e…
The following table summarizes our cash flows during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities658 (21,927)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(279)78
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
SEC’s rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
On June 6, 2026, Daniel Schumacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, entered into a 10b5-1 sales plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. This 10b5-1 sales plan provides for the sale of up to 10,000 shares of the Company's common stock related…
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, no other directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense cond…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, no directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense condition…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice