ACBMvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of ACBM against SIC 7900 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Empresa | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACBMEsta | — | — | — | — | — | -139.1%#6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOMA | $24M#3 | — | 1.7x#1 | 25.9x#4 | 11388.3%#1 | -101.6%#5 | -291.9%#5 | -20.2%#4 | -19.0%#2 | — | — | — |
| FLZH | $6M#4 | — | — | 0.3x#1 | -44.2%#5 | 39.4%#2 | -103.5%#4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADTI | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -3.2%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| AHMA | $31M#2 | 27.3x#1 | 2.5x#2 | 1.5x#2 | 9.1%#4 | 28.6%#3 | 6.4%#1 | 9.8%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| APHP | — | — | — | — | 1519.3%#2 | 76.5%#1 | -65.7%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| BATRA | $3.5B#1 | — | 6.9x#3 | 4.8x#3 | 10.5%#3 | 25.3%#4 | -1.8%#2 | -4.5%#3 | -1.1%#1 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 7900). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. Esta tabla agotó el tiempo durante su construcción, por lo que cubre parte del grupo; los rangos son solo dentro de las filas mostradas y se completará en breve. Table built 2026-11-03.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice