AEYE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AEYE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −10 | ~26 | 24 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
We had two customers (including, for each such customer, the customer’s affiliates) which accounted for 10% and 13% of our total revenue, respectively, or 23% in aggregate, in the three months ended June 30, 2026. One customer accounted for 13% of our total revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2…
In the three months ended June 30, 2026, selling and marketing expense decreased from the prior year comparable period. The decrease in selling and marketing expense was mainly driven by a reduction in marketing personnel resulting from efficiencies gained with the implementation of AI tools and aut…
In the three months ended June 30, 2026, general and administrative expense increased from the prior year comparable period. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher litigation expense, severance associated with a reduction in headcount, and amortization expens…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, Enterprise channel revenue remained consistent with the prior year comparable period as the growth in recurring revenue was mostly offset by attrition of customers added through acquisition and a reduction in non-recurring revenue. The 4% increase in Enterpr…
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, cost of revenue increased by 1% and 8%, respectively, over the prior year comparable periods. The increases in cost of revenue were primarily due to higher costs incurred for service delivery supporting our increased revenue, partially offset by a re…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
We had one customer (including the customer’s affiliates reflecting multiple contracts and a partnership with the Company) which accounted for approximately 13% and 14% of our total revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
In the three months ended March 31, 2026, both selling and marketing expense and general and administrative expense increased from the prior year comparable period. The increase in selling and marketing expense was mainly driven by higher third-party marketing
expenses and personnel costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2026 was due primarily to higher litigation, stock compensation and amortization expense.
existing partners. The 9% increase in Enterprise channel revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was driven primarily by new customer relationships, including additions from acquisitions.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, cost of revenue increased by 15% over the prior year comparable period. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to higher costs incurred for service delivery supporting our increased revenue, additional costs attributable to asset acquisitions, an…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings. These matters are subject to inherent uncertainties, and it is possible that some of these matters could ultimately be decided, resolved or settled adversely to us. Further, even if these matters are resolved favorably, they may requir…
On the basis of our current knowledge and understanding, we do not believe that judgments, settlements or orders, if any, arising from these matters (either individually or in the aggregate) will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
We may become involved in various routine disputes and allegations incidental to our business operations. While it is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of these matters, our management believes that the resolution of any such matters, should they arise, is not likely to have a mater…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, no director or executive officer adopted, modified or terminated a “10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement”, as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
On March 12, 2026, Sero Capital LLC, an entity whose Chief Executive Officer and beneficial owner is David Moradi, the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chief Product Officer, terminated a pre-arranged trading plan that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange…
On March 23, 2026, Kelly Georgevich, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, terminated a pre-arranged trading plan that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act. The arrangement, originally adopted on June 9, 2025, covered the …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice