AGIO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AGIO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +32 | −29 | ~20 | 49 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +8 | −8 | ~32 | 293 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
The lead product candidate in our portfolio, mitapivat, is an activator of both wild-type and mutant pyruvate kinase, or PK, enzymes for the potential treatment of hemolytic anemias. Mitapivat is approved under the brand name AQVESME™ in the United States for the treatment of anemia in adults with n…
We submitted a supplemental New Drug Application, or sNDA, for the U.S. accelerated approval of mitapivat in sickle cell disease, or SCD, in May 2026, which was accepted with priority review by the FDA and granted a Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, goal date of November 1, 2026. To support …
We are also developing (i) AG-181, our phenylalanine hydroxylase, or PAH, stabilizer for the potential treatment of phenylketonuria, or PKU; (ii) AG-236, an siRNA in-licensed from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Alnylam, targeting the transmembrane serine protease 6, or TMPRSS6, gene for the poten…
On June 1, 2026, we entered into a license agreement with Oscotec, a South Korean biopharmaceutical company, under which Agios acquired the worldwide rights (subject to Oscotec’s right to opt-in to develop and commercialize cevidoplenib in South Korea) to develop, manufacture, and commercialize cevi…
indications. Because the acquired assets do not meet the definition of a business in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, Agios will account for the agreement as an asset acquisition.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
The lead product candidate in our portfolio, mitapivat, is an activator of both wild-type and mutant pyruvate kinase, or PK, enzymes for the potential treatment of hemolytic anemias. Mitapivat is approved in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, under the brand name AQV…
In December 2024, we announced that we submitted a marketing authorization application, or MAA, to the European Medicines Agency, or EMA for PYRUKYND® for the treatment of adult patients with non-transfusion dependent and transfusion-dependent alpha- or beta-thalassemia. In October 2025, we announce…
In the first quarter of 2026, we presented data from the phase 2 and phase 3 portions of the RISE UP study of PYRUKYND® in adults with sickle cell disease, or SCD, in a pre-supplemental New Drug Application meeting with the FDA. Based on the FDA’s recommendation, we submitted our proposal to the FDA…
In addition, we are evaluating mitapivat for the treatment of pediatric patients with PK deficiency. We are also developing (i) tebapivat, a novel PK activator, for the potential treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or LR MDS, and SCD; (ii) AG-181, our phenylalanine hydroxylase, or PAH…
•launching commercial sales of the products, if and when approved, in the United States or in other jurisdictions, whether alone or in collaboration with others, including pursuant to the NewBridge Agreement and Avanzanite Agreement;
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
not be able to successfully integrate the acquired personnel, technologies and operations into our existing business in an effective, timely and non-disruptive manner. Such transactions may also divert management attention from day-to-day responsibilities, increase our expenses and reduce our cash a…
In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, ch…
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of …
securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any f…
or studies, if performed and completed, may not be considered sufficient by the FDA or EMA to approve any marketing applications. For example, to mitigate the risk of hepatocellular injury, AQVESME™ is available only through the REMS program approved by the FDA. The FDA might require the development…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
transaction we would achieve the expected synergies to justify the transactions. We cannot predict the number, timing or size of future transactions or the effect that any such transactions might have on our operating results.
In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, ch…
rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. If we fail to receive positive results in clinical trials of our product candidates, the development timeline and regulatory approval and commercialization prospects for our most advanced product candidates, and, correspondingly, our business and fi…
negatively impact our future revenue, profitability and cash flows and substantially limit our ability to obtain a return on our investments in those product candidates.
company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause our stockholders to lose all or part of their investment.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
The following table describes, for the quarterly period covered by this report, each trading arrangement for the sale or purchase of Company securities adopted or terminated by our directors and officers that is either (1) a contract, instruction or written plan intended to satisfy the affirmative d…
Sarah Gheuens, M.D., Ph.D. (Chief Medical Officer, Head of Research & Development)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
None of our directors or officers adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K) during the quarterly period covered by this report.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice