AIFC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AIFC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-18 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-01-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +16 | −52 | ~9 | 8 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +12 | −8 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations items and as a percentage of revenue, for the periods indicated (in $000’s):
Income tax (expense) benefit from discontinued operations - 60
The following tables set forth revenues for key product and service categories, percentages of total revenue and gross profits earned by key product and service categories and gross profit percent as compared to revenues for each key product category indicated (in $000’s):
Gross Profit Gross Profit Percentage Gross Profit Gross Profit Percentage
Revenue decreased by approximately $0.1 million for the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2026, as compared to the 13 weeks ended March 29, 2025. The decrease is due to volume of transactions processed for customers.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-12
We view WLFI as a scarce, governance-enabled digital asset with long-term capital preservation and appreciation potential, inflation-hedging characteristics, and embedded productivity through protocol participation and revenue-sharing
mechanisms. With a fixed maximum supply of 100 billion tokens, WLFI powers decentralized lending, borrowing, staking, and governance within a rapidly growing DeFi platform.
A core driver of WLFI’s value is its economic linkage to USD1, the ecosystem’s flagship U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin. Issued on a fully reserved, audited, and redeemable basis, USD1 aims to establish itself a a primary medium of exchange for institutions and consumers alike. Increased adoption of U…
The Company is uniquely positioned to accelerate real-world utility for WLFI by integrating it into our existing payment and trading infrastructure, which already serves clients in North America, Europe, and Asia. Our vision includes collaborating with WLFI to help enable everyday commerce – such as…
We evaluate the performance of our operations based on financial measures such as “Adjusted EBITDA”, which is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
Despite the identified material weaknesses, management concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods disclosed in conformity wi…
The Company’s management, including our CEO and CFO, do not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, regardless of how well conceived and operated, can pr…
Our management assessed the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 28, 2026. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) of 2013 regarding Internal Control – …
● The Company does not have a properly documented internal control system in accordance with the requirements of the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) or some similarly appropriate internal control methodology or formal documentation of the Company’s systems of internal control. This co…
● The Company did not properly apply ASC 820 in valuing certain equity instruments issued as consideration in a business combination. The Company recorded and adjustment to correct the error.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-12
Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of September 27, 2025, the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the material weaknesses discussed below.
In light of the conclusion that our internal disclosure controls are ineffective as of September 27, 2025, we have applied procedures and processes as necessary to ensure the reliability of our financial reporting in regard to this Quarterly Report. Accordingly, the Company believes, based on its kn…
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2025. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in 2013 regarding Internal Control – Integra…
criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 27, 2025.
Management noted material weaknesses in internal control when conducting their evaluation of internal control as of September 27, 2025. (1) Insufficient written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
In March 2026, the Company purchased 1,070,000 shares of its common stock in the open market and retired the shares.
In April and May 2026, the Company purchased 66,951 shares of its common stock in the open market with the intent to retire the shares. The shares have not yet been retired as of the date of this filing.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-12
On January 7, 2026, Company received a delinquency notification letter from the Listing Qualifications Staff of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq”) due to the Company’s non-compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5620(a) and 5810(c)(2)(G) (the “Listing Rule”) as a result of the Company’s failure …
The Company, per the delinquency notification letter, must submit a plan regarding regaining compliance within 45 days of the letter. If the plan is accepted, the Company will have 180 calendar days, or until June 26, 2026, to regain compliance. The Company intends to file a plan of compliance, and …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice