AMLM — what changed in the latest 10-Q

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2011-08-22

• We did not complete and file a NI 43-101 compliant technical report with the TSX Venture Exchange by June 31, 2011 and, accordingly, we are no longer eligible to receive the balance of funding in the amount of $150,000 pursuant to the terms of the April 7, 2011 investment agreement.

• We incurred total operating expenses of $137,615 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $5,566,805 during the three months ended June 30, 2010, consisting of general and administrative expenses, legal and accounting fees, consulting fees, management fees, promotion and shareholder r…

• Mineral property expenditures for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 were $161,398 and $1,389,021, respectively. We did not incur any mineral property expenditures during the same periods in 2010. From inception (March 10, 2005) to June 30, 2011 we incurred total mineral property e…

• Mineral property impairment was $0 during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and $513,296 during the same period in 2010. From inception (March 10, 2005) to June 30, 2011 we incurred total mineral property impairment expense of $513,296.

• Consulting fees for related parties increased $731,368 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 to $948,422 from $217,054 for same period in 2010. Consulting fees for related parties increased by $722,906 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2011 to $1,059,250 from $336,344 for same period…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2011-06-24

• to pay the balance of the consideration payable, being $303,000 and 500,000 common shares. We expensed $295,609 as mineral property impairment during fiscal 2010 related to the costs being capitalized on the property.

• We previously granted stock options to our directors, officers, consultants and employees pursuant to our 2009 Stock Plan. Certain stock option grants provided for vesting of the stock options over certain periods of time. On January 8, 2010 we entered into amended stock option agreements with four …

• Gain on extinguishment of accrued liability - - - - (8,500 )

• Interest and debt discount expense on convertible note 73,285 170,698 201,958

• We incurred total operating expenses of $3,885,286 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $3,527,959 during the three months ended March 31, 2010, consisting of general and administrative expenses, legal and accounting fees, consulting fees, management fees, promotion and sharehold…

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2011-08-22

• There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2011-06-24

• In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in…

• Hugh Aird, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Con…

• Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of March 31, 2011 due to the material weaknesses described below.

• Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework.…

• Management evaluated the impact of ineffective control over financial reporting and concluded that the control deficiency represented a material weakness.