AVA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AVA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +97 | −47 | ~42 | 48 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 increased compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to net investment gains at our other businesses, compared to net investment losses in the respective periods of 2025. See “Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Co…
The effects of our general rate cases also increased net income in 2026.
When comparing results from the first half of 2026 to the first half of 2025, the transfer of our ownership of Colstrip (effective January 1, 2026) has resulted in fluctuations in multiple line items on the income statement, which ultimately net to an immaterial impact on net income. The removal of …
A number of wildfires have occurred within our service territory in 2026, impacting our operations. While the causes of some fires remain under investigation, virtually all have been attributed to human activity or lightning. Two fires ignited near our facilities but have since been fully contained.…
wildfire risk driven primarily by high winds and drier-than-normal conditions, we have proactively implemented enhanced system protections and public safety power shutoffs. We continue to monitor conditions closely and respond as needed to mitigate this elevated risk.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, due to increased utility margin resulting from the effects of our general rate cases and net investment gains at our other businesses compared to net investment losses in the first quart…
When comparing results from the first quarter of 2026 to the first quarter of 2025, the transfer of our ownership of Colstrip (effective January 1, 2026) has resulted in fluctuations in multiple line items on the income statement, which ultimately net to an immaterial impact on earnings. The removal…
Due to precipitation and warm weather, our hydroelectric generation year-to-date has been above normal. Due to the warm weather, the average current level of snowpack in the areas serving our hydroelectric facilities is below normal. The amount of hydroelectric generation over the rest of the year w…
Washington law requires utilities to file MYRPs of a minimum of two and up to four years. The law allows utilities filing a rate plan of 3 or 4 years the option to file a new rate plan for the third year and fourth year. Under this provision, we have the opportunity to address the numerous unpredict…
The WUTC has up to eleven months to review the general rate case filings and issue a decision. The initial settlement conference is expected to take place in May 2026, with evidentiary hearings scheduled for September 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice