Tickwind
HoyOportunidadesMercadosChat con IA
ES
Iniciar sesiónRegistrarse
Tickwind

Lee cada tick. Ve hacia dónde sopla el mercado.

  • XInglés
  • TelegramChino
  • BoletínInglés

Producto

  • Mercados
  • Zonas temáticas
  • Todas las acciones
  • Comparar
  • Acciones en tendencia
  • Oportunidades
  • Noticias
  • Discusión
  • Lista de seguimiento
  • Novedades

Cuenta

  • Ajustes
  • Boletín
  • Para prensa e investigación
  • Servidor MCP
  • Contacto
  • Iniciar sesión
  • Registrarse
MercadosZonas temáticasTodas las accionesCompararAcciones en tendenciaOportunidadesNoticiasDiscusiónLista de seguimientoNovedadesAjustesBoletínPara prensa e investigaciónServidor MCPContactoIniciar sesiónRegistrarse

© 2026 Tickwind. No es asesoría de inversión.

Hecho para el inversor curioso.

Home/AVBH/Filing changes

AVBH — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of AVBH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+48−27~55124
Market risk (Item 3)No paragraph-level changes0001
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~12
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsSome risk factors updated00~15
Other informationText added/removed00~10

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12

  • Period-end loans, net of deferred fees, increased $75.7 million, or 7% annualized, compared to December 31, 2025.
  • ● Period-end deposits increased $135.9 million, or 13% annualized, compared to December 31, 2025.
  • ● Return on average assets was 1.20% compared to 1.00% in the second quarter of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, return on average assets was 1.33% compared to 0.98% for the same period in 2025. Excluding the expense of $2.6 million from the settlement of outstanding litigation and the …
  • ● Net interest margin expanded to 4.26% in the second quarter of 2026, compared to 3.60% in the second quarter of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net interest margin was 4.32% compared to 3.56% for the same period in 2025.
  • Net charge-offs to average loans was 0.35% compared to 0% in the second quarter of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net charge-offs to average loans was 0.43% compared to (0.01)% for the same period in 2025.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13

  • Return on average assets was 1.46% compared to 0.96% in the first quarter of 2025.
  • ● Net interest margin expanded to 4.38% in the first quarter of 2026, compared to 3.52% in the first quarter of 2025.
  • ● The efficiency ratio was 50.35% in the first quarter of 2026, compared to 62.57% in the first quarter of 2025.
  • ● Repurchased 25,000 shares of our common stock for $693 thousand at an average price of $27.69 per share as part of our share repurchase program.
  • Period-end loans, net of deferred fees, increased $24.4 million, or 5% annualized, compared to December 31, 2025.

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on AVBH

AVBH overviewAVBH quant ratingAVBH fair value (DCF)AVBH vs peersAVBH revenue historyAVBH AI deep research