AVD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AVD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-10
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −62 | ~1 | 1 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −13 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The Company’s financial performance during the quarter improved over the comparable period last year with net sales up 7%. This performance included US Crop sales that were up 17%, while Specialty net sales rose 6%, and International sales declined by 7%.
The global crop protection market improved during the first quarter of 2026. However, dynamic economic and political factors, such as sudden tariff shifts and unannounced military activity in international shipping lanes, along with high cost of capital, caused growers to remain somewhat cautious an…
In spite of constrained procurement practices within the distribution channel, the Company’s financial performance improved with respect to both sales and profitability. Increased sales of higher volume products along with flat cost of goods and continued efficiency of manufacturing operations gener…
Operating expenses increased by approximately 6% but remained flat when expressed as a percentage of net sales at 29.6% compared to 29.8% in the same quarter of the prior year. Within operating expenses, selling expenses were flat, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately 7%, a…
Interest expense rose by about $2,025 due to increased borrowing, primarily driven by the new loan agreements, and increased interest rates from the revolving line of credit that was retired, and by the two term loans that replaced it on March 13, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
The agricultural economy is caught in the middle of countervailing influences. On the one hand, a strong harvest (adding to already elevated inventories of soybeans), lower commodity prices, trade tension, the government shutdown and a weak labor environment are creating an uncertain near-term outlo…
Against this backdrop, overall sales for the third quarter of 2025 increased by 1% compared to the third quarter of 2024. From a regional perspective, our domestic sales increased by 8%, while our international sales decreased by 6%. Demand for our soil fumigant products were impacted by a slow pota…
Efforts by management to transform the business into a more efficient operation led to lower cost of goods sold, which were down 15%, as compared to the same quarter of 2024. In 2024, the Company recorded expenses associated with the Dacthal recall in the amount of $16,191 that did not recur in 2025…
Operating expenses declined by 11%, as the Company continued to manage expenses closely. Our performance included the anticipated strong reduction in transformation costs that was offset by the charge pertaining to product liability claims. Operating expenses as a percent of net sales decreased to 3…
Interest expense slightly increased, as compared to the same quarter of the prior year, yielding a net loss before taxes of $11,936, as compared to a net loss of $32,766 in the third quarter of 2024.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The Company is primarily exposed to changes in interest rates related to its borrowing activities. The Company’s indebtedness to its primary lenders is evidenced by two term loans with variable rates of interest, which fluctuate with changes in the lenders' reference rate (SOFR). An increase or decr…
For more information, please refer to the applicable disclosures in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, primarily from its borrowing activities. The Company’s indebtedness to its primary lender is evidenced by a line of credit with a variable rate of interest, which fluctuates with changes in the lender’s reference rate. For m…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
As of March 31, 2026, the Company has a comprehensive set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act (1934) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified i…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
The Company has a comprehensive set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act (1934) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and …
Control Environment – within the Company’s Australian component (AgNova), the Company identified that the individuals performing control activities within the component were not sufficiently trained or adequately supervised, and lacked appropriate reporting lines and accountability in accordance wit…
Control Activities – due to insufficient resources to facilitate a timely financial close process, the operation of internal controls over financial reporting specific to the controls being performed timely in accordance with principles of the COSO framework were not operating effectively. Further, …
Risk Assessment – the Company identified that it did not design and implement an effective risk assessment based on the criteria established in the COSO framework. Specifically, the Company did not identify and assess changes to the business that could significantly impact the system of internal con…
In addition, management identified a deficiency that constituted a material weakness related to the review of customer agreements related to the accrued Program costs and customer prepayments balances. The Company did not perform a sufficiently precise review in order to appropriately consider all a…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice