AWR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AWR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +119 | −44 | ~45 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
The new 2026 rates have been reflected in GSWC’s earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2026 resulting in an increase in recorded revenues of $22.5 million largely from the second-year rates and advice letter filings, and an increase in recorded water supply costs of $5.6 million, which combined…
On July 1, 2026, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2028 – 2030. Among other things, GSWC requested capital budgets of approximately $1 billion for the three-year rate cycle.…
In January 2026, GSWC filed an application with the CPUC to acquire the water system assets from Norwalk, a city in Los Angeles County, for a purchase price of $5.25 million. On July 13, 2026, GSWC and Cal Advocates filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the two parties that wo…
The final decision provides for an increase in adopted operating revenues of $3.3 million in 2026. With regards to the advice letter projects authorized in the general rate case as previously discussed, BVES completed and placed in service capital projects totaling approximately $28 million, includi…
ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm-fixed…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The new 2026 rates have been reflected in GSWC’s earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2026 resulting in an increase in recorded revenues of $11.1 million largely from the second-year rates and advice letter filings, and an increase in recorded water supply costs of $4.8 million, which combi…
The final decision provides for an increase in adopted operating revenues of $3.3 million in 2026. In addition, the advice letter projects of at least $23.1 million are expected to generate additional annual operating revenues of approximately $3 million when the respective projects are completed, p…
ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm-fixed…
and subcontracts with third party prime contractors on military bases. Currently, ASUS has one subsidiary that has entered into a task order agreement with the U.S. government that has a term of 15 years. The contract prices for each of the contracts and recurring task order agreements are subject t…
Early in 2026, the U.S. government experienced partial shutdowns affecting mainly the Department of Homeland Security and other federal departments. Amid the recent U.S. government shutdown, the subsidiaries of ASUS have not experienced and are not expected to experience any earnings impact to their…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice