BCML — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BCML's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +60 | −83 | ~42 | 47 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −5 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
●adverse economic conditions in general and in California, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Washington in particular, as well as other markets where the Company has lending relationships;
●employment levels, labor supply, inflation, recessionary pressures, or the level of economic growth;
●changes in interest rate levels and volatility, and the timing and pace of such changes, including actions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the values of our assets and obligations, and the availabil…
●the impact of inflation and monetary and fiscal policy responses and their effects on consumer and business behavior;
●legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws, in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules;
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
uncertainties. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward- looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of factors including, but not limited to:
●adverse impacts to economic conditions in general and in California, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Washington specifically, as well as other markets where the Company has lending relationships;
●effects of employment levels, labor shortages, persistent inflation, ongoing or renewed recessionary pressures, political instability or uncertainty, and rising debt levels;
●changes in interest rate levels and the duration of such changes, including actions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the values of our assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital…
●the impact of inflation and monetary and fiscal policy responses thereto, and their impact on consumer and business behavior;
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
The Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that as of March 31, 2026, based on their evaluation, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summa…
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over fin…
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
During this evaluation, management identified a disclosure control deficiency related to the public announcement of the Company’s current stock repurchase program. While the Board of Directors had approved an open-ended repurchase authorization, a prior public announcement incorrectly stated that th…
The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of September 30, 2025, based on their evaluation, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit unde…
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2025, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over…
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the c…
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Beca…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice