BINI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BINI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2025-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +18 | −22 | ~33 | 25 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +16 | −3 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +8 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-08-14
The Company recognized other financing costs on initial recognition of warrants during the three months ended June 30, 2025 in the amount of $33.2 million due to higher value of notes with detached warrants issued during the three months ended June 30, 2025 (versus $17.9 million during the three mon…
The interest expense (mainly amortization of original issue discount (see Notes 7 - Debt to the financial statements) increased by $17.4 million in comparison to the three months ended June 30, 2024, due to a higher volume of debt outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2025.
The "Loss on settlement (GEM case)" in the amount of $14.3 million represents excess of carrying values of transferred fixed assets over liabilities to GEM during settlement in May 2025 (see Note 19 - Contingencies and claims for further details).
The net loss attributable to common stockholders (after preferred dividends) was $129.8 million, or $11,231.39 net loss per share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders after preferred dividends of approximately $96.0 million, or $95,…
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2025, to the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2024
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-05-20
Due to unfavorable market conditions and the decline of market prices of the Company’s common stock, we tested Patents acquired in September 2022 as part of the Bollinger segment (see Note 21 - Segment information) for recoverability on March 31, 2025 and recognized impairment loss in amount of $12.…
The Company recognized other financing costs on initial recognition of warrants during the three months ended March 31, 2025 in the amount of $21.1 million due to additional notes with detached warrants issued during the three months ended March 31, 2025 (no investments during the three months ended…
Net gain on revaluation of warrants obligations was $98.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025 vs $3.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2024 with the gains recorded primarily during periods when closing bid price of the Company's common stock was lower than conversion …
Similarly, the interest expense increased by $7.3 million in comparison to the three months ended March 31, 2024 due to a higher volume of debt outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2025, see Notes 7 to the financial statements.
The net loss attributable to common stockholders (after preferred dividends) was approximately $47.1 million, or $489.24 net loss per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders after preferred dividends of approximately $132.5 mill…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-08-14
We may not be able to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market.
To maintain listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that our closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share. Plus, if a company’s security has a closing bid price of $0.10 or less for 10 consecutive tr…
During 2023 and 2024, we received formal notices from the Nasdaq Staff that, based upon the closing bid price for our Common Stock, for the previous 30-consecutive business day period, the Company no longer satisfied the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Marke…
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iv) states that if any listed company fails to meet the Bid Price Rule after effecting one or more reverse stock splits over the prior two-year period with a cumulative ratio of 250 shares or more to one, then the company is not eligible for a Bid Price Rule complia…
While Nasdaq rules do not impose a specific limit on the number of times a listed company may effect a reverse stock split to maintain or regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule, Nasdaq has stated that a series of reverse stock splits may undermine investor confidence in securities listed on Nasda…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-05-20
Bollinger has been placed in receivership, which means the Company could lose its entire investment.
On May 7, 2025, in connection with the complaint filed by Robert Bollinger alleging breach of contract by Bollinger Motors under an Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note for $10.0 million dated October 24, 2024, the U,S, District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the “Court”) entere…
We acquired a majority ownership of Bollinger Motors in September 2022 for $148.6 million in stock and cash and invested an additional $23.7 million during the period July 2024 through March 2025. We currently own 72.7% of Bollinger Motors. Pursuant to the receivership, we are currently unable to ac…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-08-14
On August 14, 2025, the Company entered into an Amendment and Exchange Agreement (the “ August 2025 Exchange Agreement”) with certain investors (each individually an “Investor” and collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to exchange (i) certain outstanding senior secured…
The August 2025 Exchange Agreement includes certain covenants, including, among others, that (i) the Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of its common stock on a stock exchange, (ii) while Preferred Stock remains outstanding, (A) during a certain 90 day period, t…
If, upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, the Company fails to timely issue the shares of common stock, then, at the sole discretion of the Investor, the Company will pay in cash to such Investor on each trading day after the delivery date an amount equal to 1% of the product of the number of shar…
The issuance of shares of Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock pursuant to the August 2025 Exchange Agreement, and the common stock issuable upon conversion thereof, was made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)( 9) of the Securities Act because it…
Amendment to Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock Certificates of Designations
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice