BLGO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BLGO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +4 | −5 | ~35 | 30 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 10 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and include statements regarding our capital needs, business plans, liquidity and financial condition, availability of funds, operating costs, and the …
Our AEC unit has been installed and is up and running in Lake Stockholm, New Jersey, and has been removing PFAS from drinking water for local residents for over six months. The AEC's performance is undergoing regular testing by both the U.S. EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protect…
We have successfully validated the AEC as an effective system to selectively extract and collect PFAS chemicals from contaminated water, including performance testing that shows “non-detect” levels of removal, which meets both state and federal regulations. In addition to the use in Lake Stockholm N…
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, our revenues decreased 55% and 61% as compared with the same periods in 2025. The decrease is due to the cessation of sales of private-labeled pet odor control products sold to a third party under the brand name “Pooph” in August 2025. During the thr…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding BioLargo’s capital needs, business plans and expectations. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regardin…
We have successfully validated the AEC as an effective system to selectively extract and collect PFAS chemicals from contaminated water, including performance testing that shows “non-detect” levels of removal, which meets new EPA standards. We have demonstrated more than 10,000 hours of continuous o…
Our AEC unit has been installed and is up and running in Lake Stockholm, New Jersey, removing PFAS from drinking water for local residents. The AEC's performance is undergoing regular testing by both the U.S. EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. This project may represent a…
Our revenues decreased 66% in the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared with the same period in 2025, primarily due to a decreased volume of sales of our pet odor control product private labeled to a third party under the brand name “Pooph”. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, sal…
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $3,405,000 a loss of $ (0.01) per share, compared to a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2025, of $1,921,000 a loss of $ (0.00) per share. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026, increased because of the decrease in …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice