BMTM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BMTM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +15 | −29 | ~43 | 40 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +6 | −17 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Limited Number of Customers. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, three customers represented 48.9% of revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, one customer represented 15.4% of revenue. The loss of these customers could have a material adverse impact on our results of operati…
Revenue decreased by $227,000, or 2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. See below for a detailed analysis of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Publisher cost increased by $1.9 million, or 62%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. Approximately $4.9 million, or 51%, of the Company's cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was a result of publisher cost compared to $3.0 million, o…
Financing and other expense, net, increased by $64,000, or 2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025.
Effective December 31, 2025, the Company, the Lenders, and Centre Lane Partners entered into the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, which applied the following adjustments to loans with outstanding payments due on December 31, 2025, including the following modifications:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Limited Number of Customers. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 one customer represented 14.4% of revenue. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024 one customer represented 13.4% of revenue. The loss of this customer could have a material adverse impact on our results of operatio…
Revenue decreased by $211,000, or 1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Revenue increased by $3.9 million, or 10%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. See below for a detailed analysis of revenue for the…
Publisher cost was $3.7 million, which represents 39% of overall cost of revenue, and $3.0 million, or 31%, of overall cost of revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We experienced an increase of $716,000, or 24%, for the three months ended September 30, 2025,…
Financing and other expense, net, decreased by $242,000, or 7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. This decrease is related to a decrease in interest paid under the Centre Lane Senior Secured Credit Facility due to greater capitalization of interest i…
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
As part of this evaluation, we noted that the Company continues to improve its accounting processes, and that management has implemented, and continues to implement, a series of measures designed to strengthen the Company's control environment, risk assessment processes, and control activities. The …
First, the Company implemented the compliance model within Floqast to formalize identification, documentation, and monitoring of key internal controls. Through this initiative, management developed a comprehensive key control matrix that documents key controls related to significant financial statem…
Second, to improve timeliness and consistency of financial reporting, the Company optimized its month-end close process by enhancing cross-departmental coordination, automating key reconciliation and reporting activities, and reducing reliance on manual processes. These improvements have shortened t…
Third, the Company implemented a new accounting system, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central ("Business Central"), to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and integration of financial data across departments. The implementation of this system supports improved segregation of duties, system-based con…
Based on the Company's continued improvements in its accounting processes described above, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, acting as the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our internal controls and concluded that as of March 31, 2026, they were ef…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
As the Company continues to improve its accounting staff and processes, internal controls are at the forefront of our efforts to produce accurate and complete financial statements. The Company has provided standard operating procedures to ensure each process is both functioning and performed correct…
Notwithstanding the significant deficiencies described below, based on the Company's continued improvements in its accounting staff and processes described above, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated our internal controls and concluded that as of September 30, …
Outlined below are the significant deficiencies identified by management, along with the remedial actions planned.
A significant deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting. The presence of such a deficiency does not …
As the Company continues to update and integrate its accounting and project systems, we have identified deficiencies in our overall internal controls, specifically as identified below:
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice