BMY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BMY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-04-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-10-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +72 | −142 | ~6 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
During the first quarter of 2026, we made meaningful progress advancing our pipeline, highlighted by: (i) positive interim Phase III results from the SUCCESSOR‑2 study of oral mezigdomide in RRMM, (ii) positive Phase III results from the SCOUT-HCM trial of Camzyos in adolescents with symptomatic oHC…
Revenues increased 3% during the first quarter of 2026. Demand increased across the Growth Portfolio and for Eliquis, which was partially offset by the impact of generics across the remainder of the Legacy Portfolio. Additionally, revenues were impacted by lower average net selling prices for the Le…
The $0.11 increase in GAAP EPS for the first quarter of 2026 was primarily due to the impact of certain specified items, including lower amortization of acquired intangible assets, partially offset by higher IPRD impairment charges in 2026 and the expiry of royalty income on diabetes products at the…
In December 2025, we announced the U.S. Government Agreement pursuant to which we agreed to, among other things: (i) provide Eliquis for free to the Medicaid program effective January 1, 2026; (ii) donate more than seven tons of Eliquis API to fill the U.S. Strategic Active Ingredient Reserve; (iii)…
In accordance with the U.S. Government Agreement, BMS will receive certain U.S. tariff relief until January 2029, including for recently imposed tariffs relating to patented pharmaceuticals and associated pharmaceutical ingredients pursuant to the Presidential Proclamation dated April 2, 2026, and w…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-30
In 2025, we have achieved multiple regulatory approvals across our portfolio, including the: (i) approval of Breyanzi for adults with relapsed or refractory FL in the EU, (ii) approval of Camzyos for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive HCM in Japan, (iii) approval of Opdivo + Yervoy as a first-…
We continue to pursue activities to advance and expand our pipeline through our internal research and development efforts as well as through business development activities. In October 2025, BMS entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Orbital Therapeutics, which will provide the Company with …
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
Revenues increased 3% for the third quarter of 2025 and decreased 1% on a year-to-date basis. Demand increased across the Growth Portfolio and for Eliquis, which was offset by the impact of generics across the remainder of the Legacy Portfolio. Additionally, year-to-date revenues were impacted by th…
The $0.48 increase in GAAP EPS for the third quarter of 2025 was primarily due to the impact of certain specified items, including lower amortization of acquired intangible assets, and cost savings from our ongoing strategic productivity initiative in 2025, partially offset by higher one-time Acquir…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice