BYFC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BYFC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +41 | −47 | ~19 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | ~2 | 8 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Company transitioned from using the weighted average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method for measuring the ACL to a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method. Concurrently, the Company also changed the way that qualitative factors are applied in the estimation o…
The Company’s DCF methodology incorporates a probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) model, whereby PDs and LGDs are forecasted using economic scenarios over a reasonable and supportable period to generate estimates for cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated life…
The Company’s ACL model forecasts PD and LGD over a one-year time horizon, which the Company believes is a reasonable and supportable period. Beyond the one-year forecast time horizon, the Company’s ACL model reverts to historical long-term average loss rates over the remaining contractual periods. …
Expectations of future cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The resulting ACL for a loan represents the amount by which the loan’s amortized cost exceeds the net present value of a loan’s discounted cash flows. The ACL is recorded through a charge to provision for credit …
Prior to March 31, 2026, the Company measured the ACL for each of its loan segments using the WARM method. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, was calculated for each loan pool on a quarterly basis. The Company then estimated a loss rate for each pool …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-13
Certain loans, such as those that are nonperforming or are considered to be collateral dependent, are deemed to no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in the loan portfolio, because the specific attributes and risks associated with the loan have likely become unique as the cre…
The excess of consideration paid over fair value of net assets acquired for acquisitions is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested at least annually for impairment or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that indicate impairment may exist. A goodwill impairm…
Total assets increased by $682 thousand at September 30, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024, reflecting increases in securities available-for-sale of $40.1 million, bank owned life insurance of $20.1 million and loans receivable held for investment, net of the ACL, of $13.2 million, all primarily du…
Loans receivable held for investment, net of the ACL, increased by $13.2 million to $1.0 billion at September 30, 2025, compared to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to loan purchases.
Deposits increased by $103.8 million, or 13.9%, to $849.2 million at September 30, 2025, from $745.4 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in deposits was attributable to an increase of $72.9 million in certificates of deposit accounts, $26.8 million in liquid deposits (demand, interest checkin…
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-13
The ineffective design of the management review control relating to the evaluation of the accounting for loan participations sold in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including the assignment of personnel with appropriate levels of knowledge, experience and training.
Implementation of additional control procedures, including redesigning and enhancing control activities related to preparation and review of existing and new loan participation agreements, and any amendments thereto,
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice