CHEF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CHEF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −3 | ~11 | 18 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Other operating expenses, net decreased by $0.3 million primarily due to lower asset disposal losses during the thirteen weeks ended June 26, 2026 compared to the prior year quarter.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to lower fees and losses associated with debt transactions, as well as lower aggregate principal amounts of debt outstanding and lower interest rates in the current period compared to the prior year.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 31.4% and 28.0% for the thirteen weeks ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for the thirteen weeks ended June 26, 2026 resulted from increased permanent tax differences related to compensation expense.
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2026 Compared to Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 27, 2025
Organic growth contributed $224.4 million, or 11.3%, to sales growth and the remaining growth of $17.6 million, or 0.9%, primarily resulted from our acquisition of Italco. Organic case count increased approximately 6.0% in our specialty category, representing an increase in net sales of $72.3 millio…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
Other operating expenses, net decreased by $0.4 million primarily due to lower third-party deal costs.
Interest expense was relatively unchanged compared to the prior year quarter.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 23.6% and 17.6% for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2026 and March 28, 2025, respectively. The effective tax rate for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2026 reflects a smaller discrete item impact related to first quarter tax benefits from the vesting of stoc…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice