CLOQ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CLOQ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −22 | ~6 | 10 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
This change in the Company’s financial condition can be primarily attributed to a decrease in cash from $261,987 as of December 31, 2025 to $10,098 as of March 31, 2026. This reduction in current assets was partially offset by an increase in intangible assets of $149,602 due to the capitalization of…
As of March 31 2026, the Company’s liabilities were $4,235,762 compared to $4,190,752 in liabilities as of December 31, 2025. This change in the Company’s financial condition can be primarily attributed to a decrease of $43,714 in accounts payable and accrued expenses, along with an increase of $88,…
Net cash used in operating activities for the three-month period ending March 31, 2026, was $232,287 compared to $275,690 for 2025. Cash provided by or used by operating activities is driven by our net loss and adjusted by noncash items as well as changes in operating assets and liabilities. At Marc…
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
The Company had no revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
This change in the Company’s financial condition can be primarily attributed to an increase in intangible assets of $447,300 due to the capitalization of the CyberloQ Platform, $6,744 due to website development, net of amortization of $727, $21,497 due to the acquisition of patents, and an increase …
As of September 30 2025, the Company’s liabilities were $3,756,059 compared to $2,831,229 in liabilities as of December 31, 2024. This change in the Company’s financial condition can be attributed to an increase of $628,141 in convertible debt, an increase of $231,778 in accrued interest and an incr…
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2025, was $562,340 compared to $461,784 for 2024. Cash provided by or used by operating activities is driven by our net loss and adjusted by noncash items as well as changes in operating assets and liabilities. At S…
The Company had gross revenue of $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to gross revenue of $15,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, and is currently reliant on its ability to raise additional capital to continue execution of its business plan to move the Company forwa…
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice