CNTX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CNTX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +12 | −17 | ~25 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +5 | −1 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −7 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
CTIM-76: Integral Molecular Collaboration and Licensing Agreement
In April 2021, we entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement with Integral Molecular, Inc. (“Integral”) (the “Integral License Agreement”) for the development of a CLDN6 bsAb for cancer therapy. On February 29, 2024, we further amended (the "Second Amendment") the Research Collaboration an…
amended) with Integral to reflect updated financial terms. In the course of our further due diligence review of CTIM-76, we determined that certain of the licensed rights under the Integral License Agreement may incorporate intellectual property rights currently held by a third party. Specifically, …
CTIM-76 expenditures increased by $1.2 million primarily due to an increase of $1.1 million in clinical costs related to the CTIM-76 Phase 1 trial. CT-95 expenses increased by $0.6 million primarily due to an increase of $0.9 million in clinical costs related to the CT-95 Phase 1 trial, which were p…
General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a $0.2 million increase in salaries and personnel related costs, mainly as a result of higher share-based…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
In April 2021, we entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement with Integral Molecular, Inc. (“Integral”) (the “Integral License Agreement”) for the development of a CLDN6 BsAb for cancer therapy. On February 29, 2024, we further amended (the "Second Amendment") the Research Collaboration an…
United States and certain foreign jurisdictions expiring in January 2034, and then in 2025 became aware of a patent that issued in the United States expiring in March 2042, in each instance that potentially covers certain parts of the intellectual property included in CTIM-76.While we believe we wil…
CTIM-76 expenditures increased by $0.2 million due to an increase of $0.6 million in clinical costs, partially offset by a decrease of $0.4 million in preclinical and contract manufacturing costs. CT-95 expense of $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025 primarily represents $1.0 m…
General and administrative expenses did not materially change for the three months ended September 30, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
On February 4, 2026, the Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust filed a stockholder class action complaint (the “Action”) against us and our directors in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) asserting that (i) Article V, Section 2 of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorpo…
On February 24, 2026, a stipulation and proposed consent judgment (the “Stipulated Judgment”) was filed with the Court regarding the Action, and on March 11, 2026, the Court approved the Stipulated Judgment, pursuant to which Article V, Section 2 and Article VI, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incor…
On April 30, 2026, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”), pursuant to which a third party service provider (the “Provider”) of the Company agreed to pay the Mootness Fee (as defined below) in full on behalf of the Company.
On April 30, 2026, the Court granted a Stipulation and Proposed Order Closing the Case (the “Stipulated Order”). The Stipulated Order requires the payment of $850,000 in fees and expenses to plaintiff’s counsel in the Action (the “Mootness Fee”). The Court was not asked to review, and did not pass j…
On May 1, 2026, the Provider paid the Mootness Fee in full pursuant to the Letter Agreement. The Action will be closed after the Court is informed a quorum was achieved at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, which is scheduled to be held on June 24, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
are not presently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
On November 7, 2022, we entered into a License Agreement (the “CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement”) with Lonza Sales AG (“Lonza”) related to CTIM-76. On November 3, 2025, we amended the CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement (the
“First CTIM-76 License Amendment”) with Lonza to clarify the intent of certain provisions and to update certain of the licensed rights described in the appendices to the CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement.
On November 3, 2025, we entered into a License Agreement (the “CT-202 Lonza License Agreement”) with Lonza related to CT-202 in connection with the Development and Manufacturing Services Agreement between Lonza, Lonza AG and the Company, dated as of November 7, 2022 and as amended on January 9, 2025…
We shall pay certain royalties and annual payments in respect of the manufacturing and sale of CT-202, which amounts shall be determined by the party manufacturing CT-202 and include a potential annual payment of less than $500,000 and a royalty on net sales in a range between 0% and a low single di…
The CT-202 Lonza License Agreement continues until terminated, and we or Lonza may terminate the CT-202 Lonza License Agreement for uncured material breaches or insolvency of the other party. We can unilaterally terminate the CT-202 Lonza License Agreement with prior written notice to Lonza, and Lon…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice