COPR.WT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of COPR.WT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-01 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-25
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −11 | ~5 | 13 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-01
On April 17, 2026, the Company completed a private placement of convertible promissory notes and warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $1.36 million. The notes mature 12 months from issuance and are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price…
In connection with the offering, investors received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 226,332 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 per share for a five-year term. The warrant exercise price is subject to adjustment and may be reduced to an amount equal to 125% of the conversion pr…
On May 28, 2026, the Company completed a second closing under the offering for gross proceeds of $185,000. In connection with the second closing, investors received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 30,833 shares of common stock.
The securities were offered and sold to accredited investors in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D. The Company did not engage in general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offering.
The Company engaged ThinkEquity LLC as exclusive placement agent and paid customary fees, including placement agent warrants.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-25
On August 19, 2025, the Company and Multi-Metal Development Company (together with the Company, the “Buyer”) entered into a First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Mining Claims Agreement (“MCA”) with CuMo Molybdenum Mining Inc., Western Geoscience Inc., and Thomas Evans (collectively, the “Seller”…
In connection with the Amendment, Multi-Metal Development Company assigned all of its rights and obligations under the MCA to the Company. All other terms of the MCA remain in effect. The MCA continues to be subject to a force majeure clause that has suspended performance since inception, and the co…
The Company had operating expenses of $669,987 for the three months ended October 31, 2025, compared to $2,204,968 for the three months ended October 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in professional fees ($270,707 for the three months ended October 31, 2025 compared to $285,3…
The Company had a net loss of $789,035 for the three months ended October 31, 2025, compared to $2,352,581 for the three months ended October 31, 2024.
For the nine months ended October 31, 2025, compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2024
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice