CRMZ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CRMZ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-19 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −1 | ~8 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +7 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” has been amended and restated to give effect to the restatement of our financial statements, as more fully described in Note 2 to our financial statements entitled “Restatement of Previously Issued Financial…
Other income reflects a decrease in both the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and 2025 due to interest expense associated with recording sales tax and income tax in prior periods. Overall, other income decreased approximately $15 thousand, or 10%, for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the s…
Operating revenues increased approximately $222 thousand, or 2%, for the first half of fiscal 2026 compared to the same period of fiscal 2025. This overall revenue growth resulted from an increase in SaaS subscription product revenue, attributable to increased sales to new and existing subscribers, …
Data and product costs increased approximately $777 thousand, or 17%, for the first half of fiscal 2026 compared to the same period of fiscal 2025. The increase was driven by the (i) addition of senior technology leadership, (ii) shifts in reporting structure to better align departmental accountabil…
Selling, general and administrative expenses reflect an increase in both the first half of fiscal 2026 and 2025 due to recording sales tax in prior periods. Overall, selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $302 thousand, or 6%, for the first half of fiscal 2026 compared …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Other income decreased approximately $11 thousand, or 6%, for the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the same period of fiscal 2025. Short-term interest rate levels on institutional U.S. Government money market funds were lower in fiscal 2026 relative to fiscal 2025.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 19…
Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that all material information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we…
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2026, following a nexus study conducted with an external tax advisor, the Company determined it had economic and physical nexus in state and local jurisdictions where it historically had not been collecting and re…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 19…
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to mate…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice