CROX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CROX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-04-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-10-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +27 | −49 | ~16 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~7 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
•We continue to operate in an environment where consumers are feeling the effects of elevated interest rates, inflation, and future expected price increases, among other things, and as a result, there is more pressure on discretionary spending. Given this, our wholesale partners are also acting caut…
•Crocs Brand revenues increased by 0.8%, or decreased by 1.9% on a constant currency basis, compared to the same period in 2025. HEYDUDE Brand revenues decreased 12.3%, or 13.2% on a constant currency basis, compared to the same period in 2025.
•Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $322.1 million compared to $318.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to higher costs in the direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) channel driven by the Crocs Brand and impairment charges related to HEYDUDE leasehold improvement assets…
Gross margin. Gross margin decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2026, to 56.8% compared to 57.8% in the same period in 2025, primarily due to incremental duties of 100 basis points, unfavorable product mix of 80 basis points partially offset by increased pricing for the Crocs Brand of 40 ba…
Selling, general and administrative expenses. SG&A increased $3.5 million, or 1.1%, in the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to higher DTC costs of $7.9 million, driven by rent expense as a result of investments in the channel as well as variable s…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-30
•We continue to operate in an environment where consumers are feeling the effects of elevated interest rates, inflation, and future expected price increases, among other things, and as a result, there is more pressure on discretionary spending. Given this, our wholesale partners are also acting caut…
company. As a result, our calculation of certain of these metrics may not be comparable to similarly titled metrics used by other companies.
•Crocs Brand revenues decreased by 2.5%, or 3.2% on a constant currency basis, compared to the same period in 2024. HEYDUDE Brand revenues decreased 21.6%, or 21.7% on a constant currency basis.
•Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $375.3 million compared to $363.5 million in the third quarter of 2024, primarily as a result of increased investment in talent and higher costs in the DTC channel. As a percent of revenues, SG&A increased to 37.7% of revenues compared to 3…
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,% Change
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice