CRVW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CRVW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +8 | −1 | ~15 | 49 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 12 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
Six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to six months ended June 30, 2025
Revenue increased approximately $419,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was driven by new customer sales.
Our principal operating costs include the following items as a percentage of total operating expenses.
Human resource costs, including benefits and non-cash compensation
Other product deployment costs, excluding human resources and travel and entertainment costs
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Accounting standards require management to evaluate whether the Company can continue as a going concern for a period of one year after the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q (“evaluation period”). In evaluating the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, management considers the conditio…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice