CTEV — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CTEV's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +27 | −18 | ~20 | 39 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | ~3 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +7 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −5 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Three Months Ended June 30,ChangeSix Months Ended June 30,Change
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests— — — n/a— — — n/a
Network solutions revenues decreased by $3.8 million, or 7.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease in revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the property and casualty market due to non-recurring revenue in the prior period.
Payment and revenue integrity solutions revenue decreased by $1.8 million, or 5.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease in revenue was primarily due to a decrease in Clinical Negotiation.
Revenues increased by $29.3 million, or 6.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase in revenues was due to the increase in Claims intelligence solutions revenues of $34.4 million.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Costs of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization of intangible assets shown below)69,080 60,436 8,644 14.3 %
Transaction costs related to refinancing transaction— 7,792 (7,792)(100.0)%
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests— — — n/a
Network solutions revenues and Payment and revenue integrity solutions revenue remained stable in the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025.
The increase in costs of services of $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to the increase in personnel expenses of $3.5 million and access and bill review fees of $3.4 million.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required discl…
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We will continue to monitor the design and effectiveness of these and other processes, procedures and controls and make further changes as appropriate.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
We operate in a litigious environment which may adversely affect our financial results.
We may, and in the past have, become involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including litigation regarding employment matters, breach of contract, violations of laws and regulations and other commercial matters. Further, we are the subject of governmental in…
Healthcare providers have become more resistant to the use of cost management techniques and are engaging in litigation to avoid application of cost management practices. Litigation brought by healthcare providers as well as client members has challenged insurers' claims adjudication and reimburseme…
Furthermore, as previously disclosed in our current reports on Form 8-K, in August 2024, we received a confidential grand jury subpoena issued by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the "DOJ") in connection with an investigation regarding health insurance. On June 17, 2026, the DOJ …
Because we operate in an industry that is highly regulated and such regulations are continuously evolving, we cannot assure you that new federal and state laws and regulations or other changes that adversely impact healthcare providers or insurers will not lead to increased litigation risk to us and…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
On June 13, 2026, Douglas Garis, Chief Financial Officer, entered into a 10b5-1 sales plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. This 10b5-1 sales plan provides for the sale of (i) up to 40,849 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock related to th…
On May 8, 2026, Tiffani Misencik, Chief Growth Officer, entered into a 10b5-1 sales plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. This 10b5-1 sales plan provides for the sale of an indeterminate number of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock relat…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of our officers or directors adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading…
In connection with its annual review of compensation arrangements currently in place, on May 4, 2026 the Company amended: (i) the employment agreement (the “CEO Employment Agreement”) with its Chief Executive Officer, Travis S. Dalton (the “CEO”); (ii) the employment agreement (the “CFO Employment A…
•The CEO acknowledged that his 2026 annual equity grant would be in the form of a grant of time-based restricted stock units subject to a four-year vesting period with a grant date fair value of $6,750,000 and performance-based restricted stock units, with a grant date fair value of $2,250,000, subj…
•The CEO acknowledged that his target bonus percentage for 2026 would be 150% of his 2026 earned base salary, which would be based on annual base salary actually paid to the CEO in 2026.
•The Company and CFO clarified the bonus provision of the CFO Employment Agreement would be based on annual base salary actually paid to the CFO during the applicable year.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice