DBGI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DBGI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-20 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +19 | −36 | ~6 | 78 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 10 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | ~3 | 3 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company continued to expand its collegiate apparel, marketing and strategic advisory platform through existing arrangements with AAA Tuscaloosa (University of Alabama), LLC, Traffic Holdco, LLC, Buffalo Sports Properties / Learfield, The Grove Collec…
Effective January 26, 2026, the Company entered into a Marketing and Sponsorship Agreement with Learfield in connection with the University of Colorado athletic program. Under the agreement, the Company is required to provide annual consideration consisting of cash and equity in exchange for sponsor…
Effective March 12, 2026, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Athlete Capital Sports LLC pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue shares with an aggregate value of approximately $3.0 million in exchange for consulting and advisory services to be provided over a three-year term.…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, holders exercised 1,275,577 pre-funded warrants previously issued in connection with the MavDB Consulting LLC marketing services agreement, and the Company issued the related shares of common stock. In addition, holders exercised an aggregate of 4,464,60…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, holders also converted 1,250 shares of Series D Preferred Stock into 563,284 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
The Company produces the vast majority of its products in Los Angeles, with the exception of sweaters. As a result, over 90% of its products are Made in the USA, which significantly limits the Company’s exposure to tariff impositions or increases, or potential tariff impositions or increases, on imp…
In August 2025, the Company completed the initial closing of a private investment in public equity (PIPE) offering, issuing approximately 14,031.25 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, with a stated value of $1,000 per share, for gross cash proceeds of approxi…
In September 2025, pursuant to an amendment to the original agreement, the Company issued an additional 1,875 Series D Preferred shares to an investor for gross proceeds of $1.5 million, increasing the stated value to $1,150 per share (aggregate stated value of $2.16 million).
The Company is required to hold the proceeds from the offering in a segregated bank account, with 50% released upon the second closing and the remaining 50% to be released upon satisfaction of the following conditions: (i) shareholder approval of the reverse stock split and 20% rule, and (ii) SEC ef…
The Series D Preferred Stock carries a conversion feature into common stock, subject to Nasdaq ownership limitations, and was issued at a discount, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of $12.7 million before deducting offering costs.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
In June 2022, a dispute originated due to a contractual arrangement involving alleged unpaid service fees of approximately $28,000, as well as additional disputed amounts, and counterclaims asserted by the Company for damages arising from website-related issues. A default judgment of approximately $…
In June 2021, a vendor filed a lawsuit against Bailey related to a retail store lease in the amount of $1,500,000. The Company is disputing the claim for damages and the matter is ongoing. The vendor has recently updated the claim to now be $450,968 after signing a long-term lease with another brand…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
● On March 21, 2023, a vendor filed a lawsuit against the Company related to trade payables totaling approximately $43,501. Such amounts include interest due, and are included in accounts payable, net of payments made to date, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not bel…
● On November 16, 2023, a vendor filed a lawsuit against the Company related to trade payables totaling approximately $345,384, which represents past due fees and late fees. Such amounts are included in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company does not believe it is probable that the losses in e…
● In June 2021, a vendor filed a lawsuit against Bailey 44 related to a retail store lease in the amount of $1.5 million. The Company is disputing the claim for damages and the matter is ongoing. The vendor has recently updated the claim to now be $450,968 after signing a long-term lease with anothe…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice