DHTI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DHTI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-21 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-23
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −17 | ~21 | 13 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 8 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 11 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-21
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $1,408,784 compared with revenue of $2,777,108 during the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $1,368,324, or 49.27%. a reduction in projects under Bothof Brothers during the three month period ended March 31, 2026 compared to March…
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $44,904 compared with revenue of $127,674 during the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $82,770, or 644.8%. Deposition Technology closing out projects during fiscal 2026 and working to backfill the sales pipeline.
Cost of Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $1,119,930, compared to cost of revenues of $2,116,964 during the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $997,034, or 47.1%. The decrease in cost of revenue is due to a reduction in projects under Bothof Brothers during the th…
Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, was $4,421,437 compared with revenue of $4,748,630 during the nine months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $327,193, or 6.9%. The increase in revenue was due to Bothof Brothers the larger number of projects that Bothof Brothers worked on during …
Cost of Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, was $3,848,323, compared to cost of revenues of $3,285,123 during the nine months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $563,200, or 17.1%. The increase in cost of revenue is due to the larger number of projects that Bothof Brothers worked on…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-23
Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2025, was $1,264,184 compared with revenue of $1,071,890 during the three months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $192,294, or 17.9%. The increase in revenue is due to a growth in residential development opportunities for Bothof Brothers Constr…
Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2025, was $137,641 compared with revenue of $21,534 during the three months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $116,107, or 539.2%. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to finalizing projects by Deposition Technology.
Cost of Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2025, was $1,111,029, compared to cost of revenues of $544,745 during the three months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $566,284, or 204.0%.. The increase in revenue is due to a growth in residential development opportunities for Bothof…
Revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2025, was $3,012,653 compared with revenue of $1,971,522 during the six months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $1,041,131, or 52.8%. The increase in revenue is due to a growth in residential development opportunities for Bothof Brothers Construc…
Cost of Revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2025, was $2,728,393, compared to cost of revenues of $1,168,159 during the six months ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $1,560,234, or 133.5%. The increase in cost of revenue is due to a growth in residential development opportunities for…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice