DORM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DORM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +35 | −17 | ~14 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
We also recognized interest income of $3.5 million related to the refunds received during the three months ended June 27, 2026, which is included in Other income, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The U.S. Administration has taken several tariff-related actions following the Supreme Court's decision, including adopting temporary tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which expired on July 24, 2026, and adopting new tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on imports fro…
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 550 basis points compared to the prior year period, primarily due to lower net tariff costs resulting from recognition of IEEPA refunds, which added 820 basis points to gross profit as a percentage of net sales in the current year period.
Our effective tax rate of 24.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2026, was slightly higher than our effective tax rate of 23.6% for the three months ended June 28, 2025.
Six Months Ended June 27, 2026, Compared to Six Months Ended June 28, 2025
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. Administration announced its intention to invoke other laws to collect tariffs and announced new tariffs on imports from all countries, in addition to any existing non-IEEPA tariffs. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of exis…
(in thousands, except percentage data)March 28, 2026March 29, 2025
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 490 basis points compared to the prior year period, primarily due to higher tariff costs in the current year period, partially offset by supplier diversification, productivity, and automation initiatives.
Interest expense, net, decreased $1.6 million for the three months ended March 28, 2026, compared to the prior year period. The decrease was driven by lower outstanding principal on our revolving credit facility and term loan, resulting from repayments over the last several quarters, as well as lowe…
Our effective tax rate of 22.5% for the three months ended March 28, 2026, was slightly higher than our effective tax rate of 22.4% for the three months ended March 29, 2025.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
Although our Senior Notes, as described in Note 5, "Debt," to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in PART I, ITEM 1 of this report are reported at cost and not adjusted for fair value changes, changes in interest rates could have a material impact on their fair value, although …
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended June 27, 2026, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended March 28, 2026, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
Termination of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. No director or officer terminated a Rule 10b5-1 Plan during the quarter ended June 27, 2026.
Non-Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. There were no non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements entered into or terminated by our directors and officers during the quarter ended June 27, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act (each, a “Rule 10b5-1 Plan”).
Termination of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. No director or officer terminated a Rule 10b5-1 Plan during the quarter ended March 28, 2026.
Non-Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. There were no non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements entered into or terminated by our directors and officers during the quarter ended March 28, 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice