DXYN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DXYN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +27 | −37 | ~1 | 4 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +5 | −3 | ~4 | 45 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
The Middle East conflict that began in late February 2026 materially increased U.S. interest rate volatility, primarily through its effect on energy markets. As oil prices rose sharply amid concerns about potential supply disruptions, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, market participants re…
We continue to be impacted by soft consumer demand driven by persistent inflationary pressures and elevated interest rates. Persistent inflation continues to hinder consumer discretionary spending, which has caused consumers to postpone large purchases of durable goods such as flooring. Macroeconomi…
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), which the U.S. administration relied on to impose certain tariffs, does not authorize the administration to impose tariffs. On March 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade ("CIT…
million related to IEEPA tariffs paid during the period from February 1, 2025 to February 20, 2026. Based on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling, related CIT proceedings, and our submission of tariff refund requests and assessment of the recoverability of amounts paid, we have concluded as of March 28, …
Notwithstanding our conclusion that recovery is probable, the timing and amount of cash receipt remain uncertain and depend on the completion of applicable CBP refund claim procedures, including validation and processing of claims, as well as any further legal, procedural or governmental development…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
We continue to be impacted by soft consumer demand driven by inflationary pressures and high interest rates. Persistent inflation continues to hinder consumer discretionary spending, which has caused consumers to postpone large purchases of durable goods such as flooring. Macroeconomic factors conti…
We continue to monitor recent trade policy and tariff announcements, including various executive orders issued by the current U.S. presidential administration. Increased restrictions on global trade, including an increase in U.S. tariffs and any retaliatory responses thereto, could result in, among …
The following tables provide information derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods indicated. Percentages used are expressed as a percent of net sales. The discussion that follows each table should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated co…
Three Months Ended September 27, 2025 Compared with the Three Months Ended September 28, 2024
For the third quarter of 2025, our net sales from continuing operations decreased 3.9% compared with the third quarter of 2024. The lower net sales were attributed to continued lower demand driven by continued high interest rates and inflation.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
At March 28, 2026, $64,526, or approximately 75% of our total debt, was subject to short-term floating interest rates. A one-hundred basis point fluctuation in the variable interest rates applicable to this floating rate debt would have an annual after-tax impact of approximately $645. Included in t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
At September 27, 2025, $73,447, or approximately 88% of our total debt, was subject to short-term floating interest rates. A one-hundred basis point fluctuation in the variable interest rates applicable to this floating rate debt would have an annual after-tax impact of approximately $734. Included …
currently set to bear interest of 5% for five years until October 28, 2025 for the Ameristate loan and October 29, 2025 for the Greater Nevada Credit Union. Every five years thereafter, these rates will be reset to reflect the then current 5-year treasury rate plus a margin. A one-hundred basis poin…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
During the quarter, we settled all claims pending against us in the previously reported lawsuit styled Moss Land Company, LLC, et al. v City of Calhoun, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, case No. 24CV74289, including all claims and counter-claims asserted against us in that cas…
Additionally, the claims asserted against us in the previously reported lawsuit styled the City of Chatsworth, Georgia and Chatsworth Water Works Commission v. 3M Company, et al. in the Superior Court of Murray County, Georgia, Case No. 25-CI-0245, have been dismissed without prejudice.
We have reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims against us in the previously reported lawsuits styled William Hartwell Brooks, et al. v City of Calhoun Georgia, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, Case No. 25CV74289, and James Haley Stephens and Pamela J. Stephens …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
As previously disclosed, we are currently defending five lawsuits based generally on alleged damages related to historical use of certain products alleged to have contained PFAS chemicals in our manufacturing processes. Following the end of the quarter, we engaged in settlement discussions with the …
Additionally, we have obtained an agreement in principle from the Plaintiffs in the pending Chatsworth matter styled, The City of Chatsworth, Georgia v. 3M Company, et al., in the Superior Court of Murray County, Georgia, Case No. 25-C10245 to dismiss without prejudice that lawsuit and the claims ag…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), which the U.S. administration relied on to impose certain tariffs, does not authorize the administration to impose tariffs. On March 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade ("CIT…
Notwithstanding our conclusion that recovery is probable, the timing and amount of cash receipt remain uncertain and depend on the completion of applicable CBP refund claim procedures, including validation and processing of claims, as well as any further legal, procedural or governmental development…
our customers. We have developed and are developing products and product offerings using fiber systems from multiple external fiber suppliers as well as from vertically integrated production of our yarn supply through dedicated internal extrusion operations. There can be no certainty as to the succe…
Our businesses rely on sophisticated systems to obtain, rapidly process, analyze and manage data. We rely on these systems to, among other things, facilitate the purchase, manufacture and distribution of our products; receive, process and ship orders on a timely basis; and to maintain accurate and u…
commercially acceptable premium levels. Additionally, adverse publicity arising from claims made against us, even if the claims are not successful, could adversely affect our reputation or the reputation and sales of our products.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-12
Our businesses rely on sophisticated systems to obtain, rapidly process, analyze and manage data. We rely on these systems to, among other things, facilitate the purchase, manufacture and distribution of our products; receive, process and ship orders on a timely basis; and to maintain accurate and u…
sales and distribution systems, and certain of our production processes are managed and conducted by computer. Any damage by unforeseen events or system failure which causes interruptions to the input, retrieval and transmission of data or increase in the service time, whether caused by human error,…
to be significant. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that costs related to defending such lawsuits will not be material in the future and will not have a material adverse impact upon the Company.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice