EHSI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EHSI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-19 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +13 | −4 | ~4 | 16 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 7 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
Policy revenue was $162,000 and $0, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively. The amount in 2026 was due to the fact that Elite began serving Medicare Advantage policy holders in 2026. Policy expenses for the same period was $183,000 and $0 respectively, mostly because in 202…
Revenue attributed to services was $1,310,000 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively due to the acquisition of PSS. Cost of revenue for the same period was $496,000 and $0, respectively.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses of $1,709,000 for the second quarter of 2026 were 149% higher than the $445,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2025, due mostly to the continued investment in Elite.
During the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company recorded no income tax benefit or provision.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company reported a net loss of $1,532,000 as compared to $441,000 for the same period a year earlier. The net loss was primarily due to the continued investment in Elite above the generation of any revenue.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
Selling, general, and administrative expenses of $1,165,000 for the first quarter of 2025 were 148% higher than the $427,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2025, due mostly to the acquisition of PSS and an increase in cost at EHP now that the health plan is operating.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 the Company recorded no income tax benefit or provision.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company reported a net loss of $1,355,000 as compared to $424,000 for the same period a year earlier. The net loss was primarily due to the acquisition of PSS.
However, management has considered its plans to continue the Company as a going concern, concentrating on the establishment and operation of managed health care plans. The Company raised gross proceeds of approximately $14 million in support of this business opportunity through the sale of its Commo…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice