EPSN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EPSN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +40 | −49 | ~16 | 9 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +5 | −1 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Our Pennsylvania (“PA”) assets are supported by our 35% ownership in the Auburn GGS.
On November 14, 2025, Epsilon acquired Peak Exploration and Production LLC and Peak BLM Lease LLC and their subsidiaries (together, "Peak") through a business combination. The acquisition added 284 gross (60 net) wells, including 105 gross (45 net) operated wells, and 60,945 gross (39,566 net) acres…
On December 11, 2025, Epsilon divested Dewey Energy Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to an undisclosed private buyer. The assets sold included approximately 964 Mcfe/d (60% natural gas) of production and approximately 6,400 net deep acres and 2,200 net shallow acres of leaseho…
We have a substantial remaining drillable location inventory within our existing leaseholds in Pennsylvania, Wyoming, and Texas.
●During the three months ended March 31, 2026, Epsilon's realized natural gas price was $5.77 per Mcf, a 47% increase over the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
In Pennsylvania, the Company owns a 35% interest in the 45-mile Auburn Gas Gathering System (“Auburn GGS") which is operated by a subsidiary of Williams Partners, LP.
Historically, our investments have been focused on our position in the Marcellus unconventional reservoir in Pennsylvania (“PA”). Our PA assets are supported by our 35% ownership in the Auburn GGS and we have a substantial remaining drillable location inventory within our existing leaseholds.
More recently, our investments have been focused in the Permian Basin in Texas and the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in Alberta, Canada.
On February 26, 2024, Epsilon acquired a 25% interest in three producing wells and 3,620 gross undeveloped acres in Ector County, Texas from a private operator. The Company participated in the drilling and completion of 2 gross (0.5 net) wells during 2024 which were put on production in May 2024 and…
On April 11, 2024, Epsilon acquired a 50% working interest in 14,243 gross undeveloped acres in Alberta, Canada. The Company participated in the drilling and completion of 2 gross (0.5 net) wells. One well was put on production in September 2024. One well was deemed non-commercial. Total capital exp…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
As a result, we performed additional analysis as deemed necessary to ensure that our condensed financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed financial statements included in this 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, our fina…
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, management identified a material weakness related to the accounting for significant and non-standard transactions. In response to the material weakness, we are in the process of devel…
While we have initiated remediation efforts with respect to the material weakness described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice