FBNC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FBNC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +46 | −24 | ~56 | 42 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | ~8 | 12 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~3 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Overview and Highlights for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026
We earned net income of $97.2 million, or $2.35 diluted EPS, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to net income of $75.0 million, or $1.81 diluted EPS, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (the "like period"). Net interest income increased $28.9 million during the six months ended Ju…
•Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $218.4 million, a 15.2% increase from the $189.5 million recorded for the like period. The increase in net interest income was driven by higher yields on interest earning assets and lower cost of funds.
•NIM increased 41 basis points to 3.69% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from 3.28% for the like period as a result of the higher average balances on loans, yields on loans and securities and lower cost of funds, particularly money market deposits.
•For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded $4.3 million in provision for credit losses as compared to $3.3 million for the like period. The lower provision in the like period was significantly impacted by the $5.5 million release of provision related to Hurricane Helene (the relea…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Total assets were $12.9 billion at March 31, 2026, a 2.2% increase from December 31, 2025. The increase was driven primarily by deposit growth generating investable funds that were deployed in interest-bearing cash and loan balances. The primary balance sheet changes are presented below.
•Total cash and cash equivalents amounted to $598.0 million at March 31, 2026, representing a $288.4 million increase from December 31, 2025. Interest-bearing cash increased $300.0 million and was partially offset by an $11.6 million decrease in noninterest-bearing cash.
•AFS securities increased $69.0 million, or 3.4%, during the three months ended March 31, 2026.
•Total deposits were $11.0 billion at March 31, 2026, an increase of $264.1 million, or 2.46%, from December 31, 2025. Deposit growth during the period was split between noninterest-bearing deposits, which increased $109.6 million, and interest-bearing deposits, which increased $154.4 million.
•Our on-balance sheet liquidity ratio was 16.7% at March 31, 2026. Available off-balance sheet sources totaled $2.5 billion at quarter end, resulting in a total liquidity ratio of 34.0%.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
When interest rates change, the yields we earn on our interest-earning assets and the rates we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities do not necessarily move in tandem with each other because of the difference between their maturities and repricing characteristics and this can negatively impact net…
rates and monetary policy influence not only the interest we receive on loans and investments and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect the average duration of our loan portfolio, investment securities and other interest-earning assets.
exposure were to be identified, it is the Company’s policy to establish and accrue appropriate reserves during the accounting period in which a loss is deemed to be probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, influence not …
optionality impacts than does a static gap analysis. From the various model results and our expectations regarding future interest rate movements, the national, regional and local economies, and other financial and business risk factors, we quantify the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
exposure were to be identified, it is the Company’s policy to establish and accrue appropriate reserves during the accounting period in which a loss is deemed to be probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
exposure were to be identified, it is the Company’s policy to establish and accrue appropriate reserves during the accounting period in which a loss is deemed to be probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice