Tickwind
HoyOportunidadesMercadosChat con IA
ES
Iniciar sesiónRegistrarse
Tickwind

Lee cada tick. Ve hacia dónde sopla el mercado.

  • XInglés
  • TelegramChino
  • BoletínInglés

Producto

  • Mercados
  • Zonas temáticas
  • Todas las acciones
  • Comparar
  • Acciones en tendencia
  • Oportunidades
  • Noticias
  • Discusión
  • Lista de seguimiento
  • Novedades

Cuenta

  • Ajustes
  • Boletín
  • Para prensa e investigación
  • Servidor MCP
  • Contacto
  • Iniciar sesión
  • Registrarse
MercadosZonas temáticasTodas las accionesCompararAcciones en tendenciaOportunidadesNoticiasDiscusiónLista de seguimientoNovedadesAjustesBoletínPara prensa e investigaciónServidor MCPContactoIniciar sesiónRegistrarse

© 2026 Tickwind. No es asesoría de inversión.

Hecho para el inversor curioso.

Home/FCFS/Filing changes

FCFS — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of FCFS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-26 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-27

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+58−46~5936
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed00~10
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~21
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————
Other informationText added/removed+10~11

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-26

  • Inventory turns (trailing twelve months cost of merchandise sales divided by average inventories)2.8 times3.9 times2.0 times3.0 times
  • Weighted-average store count for the three months ended September 30
  • Weighted-average store count for the nine months ended September 30
  • (1) Percentage of inventory aged greater than one year is 1.6% for U.S. pawn and 3.3% for total pawn excluding certain recently acquired U.S. stores which have historically carried significantly higher levels of aged jewelry inventory.
  • Percentage of inventory aged greater than one year1.9 %1.4 %7.9 %2.6 %

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-27

  • The following tables detail earning assets, which consist of pawn loans and inventories as well as other earning asset metrics of the Company’s pawn segments, as of June 30, 2026 compared to June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted):
  • Percentage of inventory aged greater than one year1.5 %1.2 %13.7 %3.3 %
  • Inventory turns (trailing twelve months cost of merchandise sales divided by average inventories)2.8 times3.8 times2.2 times3.0 times
  • Weighted-average store count for the three months ended June 30
  • Weighted-average store count for the six months ended June 30

Other information

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-26

  • On August 17, 2026, Rick L. Wessel, Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, adopted a written plan for the sale of up to 60,719 shares of the Company’s common stock that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c). The plan will expire on August 19, 20…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on FCFS

FCFS overviewFCFS quant ratingFCFS fair value (DCF)FCFS vs peersFCFS revenue historyFCFS AI deep research