FFFutureFuel Corp.vs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of FutureFuel Corp. against Industrial Organic Chemicals — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Empresa | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFEsta | $238M#9 | — | 1.6x#7 | 2.5x#10 | -60.7%#14 | -418.6%#15 | -55.3%#9 | -32.3%#11 | — | — | 43.5%#3 | 4.4%#1 |
| NEU | $8.2B#1 | 19.1x#6 | 4.4x#10 | 3.0x#11 | -2.2%#9 | -9.4%#12 | 20.0%#2 | 22.8%#2 | 15.6%#1 | 5#3 | 10.0%#6 | 1.3%#2 |
| SXT | $5.5B#2 | 34.6x#7 | 4.3x#9 | 3.4x#12 | 3.5%#6 | 7.9%#11 | 12.8%#4 | 10.7%#4 | 7.9%#3 | — | 28.9%#5 | 1.3%#3 |
| REX | $1.4B#3 | 11.6x#5 | 2.1x#8 | 2.2x#7 | 1.2%#8 | 42.6%#6 | 16.4%#3 | 12.3%#3 | 13.7%#2 | 6#1 | 39.1%#4 | — |
| GPRE | $1.1B#4 | 9.0x#4 | 1.2x#4 | 5.6x#13 | 16.0%#3 | -47.0%#14 | -35.6%#8 | -13.9%#7 | -6.1%#6 | 5#3 | 46.1%#2 | 0.1%#4 |
| WLKP | $757M#6 | — | — | 0.6x#3 | 2.7%#7 | -21.9%#13 | 27.4%#1 | — | — | — | -0.6%#7 | — |
| GEVO | $373M#7 | — | 1.4x#5 | 2.3x#8 | 849.3%#1 | 57.0%#5 | -12.6%#6 | -12.4%#6 | -4.9%#5 | 5#3 | -20.1%#10 | — |
| ALTO | $312M#8 | 6.0x#3 | 1.2x#3 | 0.3x#2 | -4.9%#10 | 122.6%#2 | 0.8%#5 | 0.0%#5 | 2.3%#4 | 6#1 | 243.6%#1 | — |
| LODE | $189M#10 | — | 1.4x#6 | 121.8x#15 | -48.5%#13 | 19.2%#8 | -2455.2%#15 | -31.4%#10 | — | 4#8 | -15.0%#9 | — |
| SAFX | $177M#11 | — | 4.7x#12 | 8.5x#14 | — | 407.0%#1 | -326.1%#14 | 198.6%#1 | -42.3%#10 | — | -66.7%#15 | — |
| CDXS | $148M#12 | — | 4.5x#11 | 2.1x#6 | 18.6%#2 | 32.6%#7 | -59.3%#10 | -133.4%#12 | -89.4%#11 | — | -45.7%#13 | — |
| AMTX | $138M#13 | — | — | 0.7x#4 | -26.2%#11 | 12.0%#10 | -18.8%#7 | — | -40.1%#9 | 5#3 | -12.4%#8 | — |
| LNZA | $76M#14 | 0.3x#2 | 0.3x#2 | 1.4x#5 | 12.6%#4 | 64.4%#3 | -141.7%#12 | -18.8%#8 | -35.2%#7 | — | -70.2%#16 | — |
| TOMZ | $14M#15 | — | 9.7x#13 | 2.5x#9 | -27.2%#12 | 16.3%#9 | -68.4%#11 | -262.5%#13 | -90.9%#12 | 5#3 | -32.5%#12 | — |
| LNZAW | $261783#16 | 0.0x#1 | 0.0x#1 | 0.0x#1 | 12.6%#4 | 64.4%#3 | -141.7%#12 | -18.8%#8 | -35.2%#7 | — | -20.3%#11 | — |
| BAK | $797M#5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -48.2%#14 | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 2860). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice