FRPH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FRPH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +53 | −72 | ~23 | 45 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 5 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
At March 31, 2026, this segment was invested in the following development parcels:
1)Riverfront on the Anacostia: The Riverfront on the Anacostia property is a 5.8-acre parcel of real estate in Washington, D.C. that fronts the Anacostia River and is adjacent to the Washington Nationals Baseball Park. A revised Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan was approved in 2012 and permitted …
2)Square 664E: The Company’s Square 664E property is approximately two acres situated on the Anacostia River at the base of South Capitol Street less than half a mile down river from our Riverfront on the Anacostia property. This property is currently under lease to Vulcan Materials for use as a con…
cost of $4.2 million in anticipation of future high-rise development. The net book value of this property is $7.0 million.
3)Hampstead Trade Center: The Hampstead Trade Center property in Carroll County, MD is a 118-acre parcel located adjacent to the State Route 30 bypass. The parcel was previously zoned for industrial use, but our request for rezoning for residential use was approved in December 2018. Management belie…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
We also have three properties that were either spun off to us from Florida Rock Industries in 1986 or acquired by us from unrelated third parties. These properties, as a result of our “highest and best use” studies, are being prepared for income generation through sale or joint venture with third pa…
Development Segment - Significant Investment Lands Inventory:
Riverfront on the Anacostia Phases III-IV2.25Conceptual design program ongoing $8,722,000
Hampstead Trade Center, MD118Seeking PUD in preparation for sale$12,484,000
Square 664E, on the Anacostia River in DC 2.1Under lease to Vulcan Materials as a concrete batch plant through 2026$7,076,000
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
decrease in SOFR would increase cash flows before income taxes by $0.3 million annually. The Company had $111.7 million of cash equivalents and variable rate lending venture advances at March 31, 2026, so a 100 basis point increase in SOFR would reduced cash flows before income taxes by $1.1 million…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
The Company did not have a material amount of variable rate debt at September 30, 2025, so a sensitivity analysis was not performed to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice