FSTR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FSTR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +41 | −21 | ~14 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
During the second quarter of 2025, the Company announced the discontinuation of its Automation and Materials Handling (“AMH”) product line which was reported in the Technology Services and Solutions business unit within the Rail segment (the “AMH Exit”). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2…
During the second quarter of 2026, the Company announced the discontinuation of certain product lines within our Tew Engineering business (the “Tew Exit”) which was reported in the Technology Services and Solutions business unit within the Rail segment. The decision to exit was due to the Company's …
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest3 (46)49
Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 decreased $5,008, or 3.5%, from the prior year quarter, driven by lower sales in both segments. Rail net sales declined $3,961, or 5.2%, while Infrastructure declined $1,047, or 1.5%.
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was flat compared to the prior year quarter. Rail gross profit declined $321, as benefits from favorable business mix were offset by $2,084 of costs related to the Tew Exit, compared to $1,085 of costs associated with the AMH Exit in the prior ye…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
During the second quarter of 2025, the Company announced the discontinuation of its Automation and Materials Handling (“AMH”) product line which was reported in the Technology Services and Solutions business unit within the Rail segment. AMH had net sales of $407 for the three months ended March 31,…
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $23,352, or 23.9%, over the prior year quarter. The increase was driven by Rail sales growth of $20,761, or 38.4%, with Infrastructure sales also improving $2,591, or 5.9%.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $5,545, or 27.5%, over the prior year quarter driven primarily by higher volumes in Rail which improved $4,113 and improved volumes, business mix, and manufacturing execution in Infrastructure which contributed $1,432. Gross profit mar…
Selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $2,081, or 9.9%, over the prior year quarter, primarily attributable to higher personnel costs driven by merit, incentive costs, and a $675 accelerated stock expense due to retirement-eligible participants. Selli…
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased $504, or 44.9%, from the prior year quarter due to acquired intangible assets becoming fully amortized.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice