FTRE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FTRE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +13 | −10 | ~13 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
The Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were $1,314.7, a decrease of 3.4% from revenues of $1,361.6 in the corresponding period in 2025. The change in revenues was due to a decrease in organic revenues of 4.0%, partially offset by favorable foreign currency translation of 0.6%.…
Direct costs decreased 5.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared with the corresponding period in 2025. The change in direct costs was due to a decrease in organic direct costs of 6.9%, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation of 1.5%. Direct costs decreased as a…
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 17.8% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared with the corresponding period in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to lower information technology and personnel costs, including the benefit of restructuring actions, as well as …
The change in amortization of intangibles and other assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2025, was not significant.
There were no goodwill and other asset impairments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Goodwill impairment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 was $309.1 and $797.9, respectively. This impairment was specific to the Clinical Development reporting unit.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
The change in depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the corresponding period in 2025, was not significant.
There were no goodwill and other asset impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Goodwill impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $488.8 and was specific to the Clinical Development reporting unit.
The change in restructuring and other charges for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the corresponding period in 2025, was not significant.
The decrease in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared with the corresponding period in 2025, was due to lower average debt outstanding during the first quarter of 2026, driven by the repurchase of $75.7 of senior secured notes in 2025 and zero borrowing on the revol…
The change in foreign exchange gain (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the foreign exchange gain (loss) for three months ended March 31, 2025, was primarily due to the fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar against the British Pound and the Euro.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice