FTV — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FTV's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-28 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −8 | ~58 | 59 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-28
Geographically, all regions delivered strong core revenue growth in both the third quarter and the year-to-date period, with greatest contribution from North America.
Sales growth in the third quarter and year-to-date period was driven by favorable pricing across the segment of 2.8% and 2.3% and volume growth of 0.3% and 2.4%, respectively. Demand increased in both the third quarter and year-to-date periods, driven primarily by sterilization products. In the year…
Geographically, core revenue growth was driven by strong growth in Asia-Pacific and LATAM in both the third quarter and the year-to-date period. North America experienced modest growth in the third quarter, with stronger growth on a year-to-date basis.
The year-over-year increase in gross profit during the third quarter and year-to-date period was driven by higher volume, favorable pricing, tariff refunds, and favorable impacts from foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by product mix, higher employee costs, and growth investments.
•We made dividend payments to common shareholders totaling $57 million.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
Geographically, core revenue growth in both the second quarter and the year-to-date period was driven primarily by strong demand in North America as well as solid growth in Latin America and Asia-Pacific, slightly offset by a decline in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”).
Sales growth in the second quarter and year-to-date period was driven by volume growth of 3.4% primarily driven by increased demand for sterilization products, favorable pricing across the segment of 1.9% and 2.1%, respectively, and favorable foreign currency translation.
Geographically, core revenue growth was primarily driven by strong growth in North America and Latin America in both the second quarter and the year-to-date period.
The year-over-year increase in gross profit during the second quarter and year-to-date period was driven by favorable pricing, higher volume, gains from productivity measures and FBS initiatives, and tariff refunds, partially offset by product mix and higher employee costs. The increase in the year-…
existing available capacity under our credit facilities to provide short-term funding. As of July 3, 2026, we expect to have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash needs for the foreseeable future.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice