GNE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GNE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −19 | ~31 | 31 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Net results from discontinued operations of Lumo Sweden, net of taxes was minimal for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 and six months ended June 30, 2026. Net loss from discontinued operations of Lumo Sweden, net of taxes was minimal for $0.1 million for the six months ended Jun…
Non-POR receivables will generally have higher collection risks than those covered by POR programs, and our reserve for credit losses will generally increase when the portion of our sales in non-POR territories increases.
The year-over-year increase in GRE's income from operations were driven by gross margin expansion. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense primarily reflected higher customer acquisition spending resulting from a shift in the sales mix to certain high value customer segments with…
Revenues. Electricity revenues decreased by 7.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was due to a decrease in electricity consumption partially offset by an increase in the average price per kilowatt hour charged to customers in the three months …
Electricity revenues decreased by 5.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was due to a decrease in electricity consumption partially offset by an increase in the average price per kilowatt hour charged to customers in the six months ended June 30,…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Net loss from discontinued operations of Lumo Sweden, net of taxes was minimal for and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Revenues. Electricity revenues decreased by 4.5% in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was due to a decrease in electricity consumption partially offset by an increase in the average price per kilowatt hour charged to customers in the three months…
Natural gas revenues increased by 24.4% in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was a result of a 37.0% increase in average revenue per therm sold in the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, due to general market co…
Other revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2025 pertains to revenues from customer termination fees from commercial customers.
In the three months ended March 31, 2026, average monthly churn increased to 5.8% compared to 5.5% for the same period in 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice