GNL — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GNL's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +64 | −34 | ~47 | 43 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +4 | −37 | 0 | 0 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $35.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The change in net loss attributable to common stockholders is discussed in detail for each line item of the consolidated stat…
loss of revenue from dispositions primarily resulted from the sale of two groups of properties that were leased by two of our former tenants. There was minimal impact from the year-over-year change in average exchange rates during the three months ended June 30, 2026, when compared to the same perio…
Total Industrial & Distribution revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026 included approximately $4.0 million of termination fees.
Revenue from tenants in our Office segment was $30.8 million and $34.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in the second quarter of 2026, when compared to the same period last year, was primarily driven by the net loss of revenue of approximately $5.…
Total Office revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026 included approximately $2.0 million of payments received from former tenants to settle their lease obligations related to the condition and restoration of the leased space upon move-out.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $16.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to $200.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The change in net loss attributable to common stockholders is discussed in detail for each line item of the consolidated …
from the year-over-year change in average exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2026, when compared to the same period last year.
Revenue from tenants in our Retail segment was $29.5 million and $37.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by the loss of revenue of approximately $7.6 million from dispositions, partially offset by an increase in revenue from o…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we determined that six of our properties located in the U.S. had an estimated fair value that was lower than the carrying value of the properties, based on the estimated selling price less selling costs of such properties, and as a result, we recorded im…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Except as set forth in Part II Item 1A of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2026, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and we direct you to those risk factors.
An adverse outcome in any litigation or other legal proceedings instituted against us, Modiv or our respective directors relating to the proposed Mergers could have a material adverse impact on the businesses of GNL and Modiv and may prevent the Mergers from becoming effective within the expected ti…
As of the date of this report, Modiv has received multiple demand letters from, and is aware of two complaints that have been filed on behalf of, purported Modiv stockholders in connection with the Mergers. The letters and complaints allege certain disclosure deficiencies in the preliminary proxy st…
Potential litigation related to the Mergers may result in injunctive or other relief prohibiting, delaying or otherwise adversely affecting the parties’ ability to complete the Mergers. Such relief may prevent the Mergers from becoming effective within the expected timeframe or at all. In addition, …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
You should carefully consider the risks described below and those risks described in “Item 1A, Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by any of the risk…
The announcement and pendency of the Mergers may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and price of our common stock.
We are subject to risks in connection with the announcement and pendency of the Mergers, including, but not limited to, the following:
•Market reaction to the announcement and pendency of the Mergers;
•Changes in our business, operating results, market price of our common stock and prospects generally;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice