GRNQ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GRNQ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +51 | −33 | ~23 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +6 | −1 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
On August 6, 2026, at the open of trading, the Company will effect a 1-for-10 (1:10) reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 10 shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock will automatically combine into …
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, we operated in three regions: Hong Kong, China and Malaysia. We derived revenues from the provision of business services, digital platform services and trading of digital assets, and leasing or trading of our commercial properties, respe…
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025
Total revenue was $302,167 and $427,092 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively. The decreased amount of $124,925 was primarily due to a decrease in business services revenue. We expect revenue from our service business to recover slightly in the following months.
Revenue from the provision of business services was $248,609 and $395,257 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively. It was derived principally from the provision of business consulting and advisory services, as well as company secretarial, accounting, and financial analysis s…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, we operated in three regions: Hong Kong, China and Malaysia. We derived revenues from the provision of business services, digital platform services and trading of digital assets, and leasing or trading of our commercial properties, respectively…
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025
Total revenue was $405,386 and $352,755 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively. The increase of $52,631 was primarily due to an increase in digital revenue. We expect revenue from our digital business to steadily grow as we are developing our digital platform and trading b…
Revenue from the provision of business services was $310,746 and $310,853 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively. It was derived principally from the provision of business consulting and advisory services, as well as company secretarial, accounting, and financial analysis …
Revenue from the digital platform and trading was $78,459 and $26,256 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively. It was derived from trading of other digital assets of $78,459 and $26,256 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025, respectively. We experienced an inc…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
On March 7, 2026, the Shijiazhuang Intermediate People’s Court of Hebei Province in the People’s Republic of China made a final ruling (Ruling No.: Criminal Final No. 93 of 2026, Ji 01 Intermediate People’s Court) subsequent to a judgment entered by the Shijiazhuang Qiaoxi District People’s Court of…
On June 15, 2026, the Company’s board of directors approved a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims (the “Settlement Agreement”) via unanimous written consent.
On June 24, 2026, the Company entered into the Settlement Agreement with MFAI. The Settlement Agreement resolves all claims asserted in the Nevada state court action (Case No. A-21-840033-B) and the related JAMS arbitration (Ref. No. 5260000038), including claims previously disclosed by the Company …
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, and subject to the parties’ satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including delivery of executed dismissal documents, the Company agreed to pay MFAI $100,000 and surrender 2,000,000 restricted shares of MFAI’s Class B common stock for cancellation.
The 2,000,000 restricted shares of MFAI Class B common stock to be surrendered for cancellation represent the entirety of the Company’s equity interest in MFAI. As previously disclosed, the Company acquired these shares on July 1, 2020 as consideration for the sale to MFAI of the Company’s 4% owners…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of losses, if any, that may result from this proceeding. Management does not believe, based on information presently available, that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s finan…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice