HODO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of HODO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +54 | −66 | ~3 | 9 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +12 | −17 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +320 | −6 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
House of Doge is committed to advancing the utility and adoption of Dogecoin by investing in the necessary infrastructure to integrate it into everyday commerce and through strategic cultural partnerships.
The Company is in the process of developing secure, scalable and efficient systems designed for real-world applications. These systems encompass digital payments, various financial products and real-world asset tokenization. It also provides consulting, educational resources and operational support …
The key performance indicators for House of Doge are revenue growth, operating income and net income.
The Company measures its success by revenue growth. Revenue growth will be dependent on the Company’s ability to drive utility and institutional acceptance of Dogecoin.
The Company uses operating income to measure the profitability of its core business operations. Operating income helps to evaluate the Company’s ability to cover operational expenses, make decisions on new opportunities and track progress on its strategic goals. This metric provides insights into ef…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Brag House is a mission-driven organization that utilizes a diversified business strategy to operate a media-tech platform designed for casual college gamers to drive community-driven gaming experiences anchored in the college sports culture, while creating authentic pathways for brands to connect w…
Brag House is a Delaware corporation formed in December 2021. Our founders developed the idea for the Brag House platform in 2018, when our Chief Executive Officer, Lavell Juan Malloy, II, and our Chief Operating Officer, Daniel Leibovich, recognized a need in the gaming industry for a gaming platfo…
We believe that we are creating a new sports entertainment medium for Gen Z to engage through gaming by merging gameplay with school spirit in Brag House and student-led activations and tournaments tied to college rivalries with Brag House features and capabilities such as our Bragging Functionality…
We are focused on creating an organic and inclusive community that facilitates personalized experiences. We believe that our experiential framework offers a more authentic and differentiated channel for advertisers to utilize, making the otherwise elusive demographic of gamers and streamers accessib…
In May 2025, we launched the first activation under our strategic partnership with Learfield Communications, LLC (“Learfield”). This activation was for students and alumni of the University of Florida, one of Learfield’s media rights properties.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
The Company holds warrant assets and a warrant derivative liability and has material exposure to equity-market prices, Dogecoin prices and Level 3 valuation assumptions; however, it does not use derivatives for hedging. Total investments were approximately $24.8 million at June 30, 2026 and $10.6 mi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e), promulgated by the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information …
In connection with the review of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three month period ending June 30, 2026, our external auditors (“Davidson & Company LLP) considered the following deficiency in the Company’s internal control to be a material weakness:
The Company has made and continues to make material investments in private companies without directly observable trading prices. We recommend the Company formally engage or hire valuation experts for material investments or non-cash payments requiring complex valuation models.
As defined in the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) of the United States, a material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material mi…
We will take measures to address the material weakness by engaging with a qualified valuations expert for material investments or material non-cash payments requiring complex valuation models.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e), promulgated by the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information…
As required by SEC rules and regulations implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance re…
(1)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our company,
(2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and
(3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Risks Related to the Company’s Operations Following the Merger
We have operating net losses and our financial results are subject to fluctuations.
During its short operating history, the Company has reported net losses; we anticipate increasing expenses in the future and may never become profitable. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Our failure to become and remai…
The Company expects to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on developing technologies, marketing, partnerships and acquiring strategic assets. These efforts may be more costly than expected and may not result in increased revenue or growth. Any failure to increase revenue su…
Our history of recurring losses and anticipated expenditures raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern requires that we obtain sufficient funding to finance our operations.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
On January 6, 2026, the Company received a deficiency letter (the “Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that, based upon the closing bid price of the Company’s Common Stock for the last 30 consecutive business days, the C…
The Notice has no immediate effect on the continued listing status of the Common Stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market, and, therefore, the Company’s listing remains fully effective.
In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company is provided a compliance period of 180 calendar days from the date of the Notice, or until July 6, 2026, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. To regain compliance, the closing bid price of the Common Stock must meet …
If the Company is not in compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement by July 6, 2026, the Company may be afforded a second 180 calendar day compliance period. To qualify for this additional compliance period, the Company will be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of …
The Company intends to actively monitor the closing bid price of the Common Stock and will evaluate available options to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement during the 180 day …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice