HWLDFvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of HWLDF against SIC 7011 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Empresa | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWLDFEsta | — | — | — | — | 10.5%#3 | 73.7%#2 | 26.9%#1 | 39.7%#2 | 82.8%#2 | — | — | — |
| CNTY | — | — | — | — | -0.5%#5 | 60.0%#4 | 8.9%#5 | — | 33.3%#4 | 6#1 | — | — |
| ATAT | — | — | — | — | 41.0%#1 | 32.7%#6 | 23.6%#3 | 45.1%#1 | 292.3%#1 | — | — | — |
| GHG | — | — | — | — | -14.7%#6 | 58.3%#5 | 5.2%#6 | 10.6%#4 | 11.9%#6 | — | -52.1%#1 | — |
| HIGR | — | — | — | — | -46.6%#7 | -79.4%#7 | -236.0%#7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| HTHT | — | — | — | — | 10.5%#3 | 73.7%#2 | 26.9%#1 | 39.7%#2 | 82.8%#2 | — | — | — |
| MLCO | — | — | — | — | 11.3%#2 | 325.0%#1 | 11.6%#4 | — | 13.2%#5 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 7011). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. Esta tabla agotó el tiempo durante su construcción, por lo que cubre parte del grupo; los rangos son solo dentro de las filas mostradas y se completará en breve. Table built 2026-08-01.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice