Tickwind
HoyOportunidadesMercadosChat con IA
ES
Iniciar sesiónRegistrarse
Tickwind

Lee cada tick. Ve hacia dónde sopla el mercado.

  • XInglés
  • TelegramChino
  • BoletínInglés

Producto

  • Mercados
  • Zonas temáticas
  • Todas las acciones
  • Comparar
  • Acciones en tendencia
  • Oportunidades
  • Noticias
  • Discusión
  • Lista de seguimiento
  • Novedades

Cuenta

  • Ajustes
  • Boletín
  • Para prensa e investigación
  • Servidor MCP
  • Contacto
  • Iniciar sesión
  • Registrarse
MercadosZonas temáticasTodas las accionesCompararAcciones en tendenciaOportunidadesNoticiasDiscusiónLista de seguimientoNovedadesAjustesBoletínPara prensa e investigaciónServidor MCPContactoIniciar sesiónRegistrarse

© 2026 Tickwind. No es asesoría de inversión.

Hecho para el inversor curioso.

Home/IMCR/Filing changes

IMCR — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of IMCR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+26−15~2564
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed00~27
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~21
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————
Other informationNo paragraph-level changes0004

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06

  • Enrollment in the registrational Phase 3 TEBE-AM trial, evaluating tebentafusp as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, versus a control arm in patients with previously treated advanced cutaneous melanoma, is nearing the target of 540 patients, with topline data that could come as early…
  • During the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting in May, we presented two posters:
  • 1) "Phase 1 evaluation of the PRAME‑targeted ImmTAC brenetafusp in advanced melanoma": The data showed improved clinical activity of brenetafusp monotherapy, in heavily-pretreated advanced melanoma, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 17% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 67%, in the 160 mcg vs…
  • 2) "Effect of IL7 on ImmTAC-mediated killing by T cells in vitro and T-cell fitness in patients": Building on previously disclosed data regarding the importance of T cell fitness for the efficacy of ImmTAC molecules, the new data demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of these therapies may increase w…
  • The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) is now enrolling patients in the United States for the Phase 3 Adjuvant Trial in Ocular Melanoma (ATOM).

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06

  • We presented the five-year overall survival (OS) from our pivotal Phase 3 trial with KIMMTRAK in unresectable or mUM, in an oral session at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) 2026 meeting. This is the longest, prospective Phase 3 randomized trial in patients with unresectable or mUM…
  • In the Phase 3 trial, KIMMTRAK doubled the likelihood of being alive at five years, with an OS for KIMMTRAK of 16% versus 8% in the control arm (hazard ratio of 0.67 [95% CI: 0.54-0.85]).
  • In the trial, 378 patients were randomized to tebentafusp (252) or investigator’s choice (126; 82% pembrolizumab). The median OS was 21.6 months on KIMMTRAK, versus 16.9 months on investigator’s choice (IC). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves separated early and remained separated over time, confirmin…
  • The OS benefit with KIMMTRAK was observed regardless of known poor prognostic factors at baseline (high tumor burden [≥10cm]; elevated lactate dehydrogenase) or tumor location (hepatic only; hepatic and extra-hepatic). OS benefit was also observed in patients with a best response of progressive dise…
  • More patients continued treatment beyond progression in the KIMMTRAK arm than in the control arm (57% vs 25%) – with the trial allowing this option in both arms. Patients on KIMMTRAK achieved nearly a 7-fold higher rate of tumor reduction with treatment beyond initial progression compared to IC pati…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on IMCR

IMCR overviewIMCR quant ratingIMCR fair value (DCF)IMCR vs peersIMCR revenue historyIMCR AI deep research